Kevin Rudd’s population policy already decided?

Population0

 
“Kevin Rudd said on Saturday that the new Minister, Tony Burke, must be ‘acutely mindful’ of the positive implications of growth on the economy.
 
“There are many other things Mr Burke could have been told to mind, such as the impact of increased population on biodiversity, or water, or shortage of infrastructure. 
 
“The PM’s marching orders unfortunately tell Mr Burke to come out on the side of the development lobby, which has immediately skewed the whole debate.
 
“The new portfolio being based in Treasury, rather than, for instance, Environment, further shows that the PM’s views on the matter are blinkered.
 
“The new Minister was formerly a Shadow Immigration Minister and, given the Rudd Government’s shocking record of increasing immigration without telling the Australian public in the 2007 election that this was their intention, Mr Burke will be carrying a lot of baggage.
 
“The former Shadow Environment Minister, Kelvin Thomson, has shown himself to be the only Federal Labor MP who understands that without an environmentally sustainable future there is no future. That Kevin Rudd has picked Tony Burke over Kelvin Thomson says far more about the PM’s politicking on this vital issue than about Kelvin Thomson’s deep understanding and commitment to a sustainable Australia” said Ms Kanck.
 
 
Further comment: Sandra Kanck 08 8336 4114 or 0417882143
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 April 2010 10:25 )

 

Comments  

 
#1 Brian Sanderson 2010-05-07 09:49

There is also a strong economic argument to be made in favour of limiting population to an optimal number. I highly recommend:

Paul Colinvaux, 1980. The Fates of Nations: A Biological Theory of History.

Colinvaux explains the associations between human population growth, warfare, and human suffering due to diminished economic opportunity.

Quote