On Arctic Sea ice melt and coal mine canaries

General news0

On Arctic Sea ice melt and coal mine canaries

Despite peak global temperatures in 2005 and 2010 (unprecedented in the instrumental record), a recent sharp plunge in volume of the Arctic Sea ice and a spate of extreme weather events, coal mining, coal exports and carbon emissions continue to grow, overwhelming any mitigation attempted by schemes…


Disclosure Statement

Andrew Glikson is Honorary Professor at the Geothermal Energy Centre of Excellence, The University of Queensland, and a Visiting Fellow at the Australian National University.

The Conversation

The Conversation is an independent source of information, analysis and commentary from the university and research sector—written by acknowledged experts, curated by professional editors and delivered direct to the public. read more

Articles by This Author

24 February 2012 Is another mass extinction event on the way?30 January 2012 We do need drastic action on climate change: a response to the Wall Street Journal18 January 2012 As emissions rise, we may be heading for an ice-free planet 8 December 2011 Last chance at Durban? The geological dimension of climate change23 September 2011 An Orwellian climate

Kv97mq2h-1332378179 Melting Arctic Sea ice should be the warning we need about expanding coal exports. Michael Sonnabend

Despite peak global temperatures in 2005 and 2010 (unprecedented in the instrumental record), a recent sharp plunge in volume of the Arctic Sea ice and a spate of extreme weather events, coal mining, coal exports and carbon emissions continue to grow, overwhelming any mitigation attempted by schemes such as the Australian carbon price.

And although both – local emissions and emissions from exported Australian coal – are vented into the same atmosphere, in political terms it appears as if they occur on different planets.

Following the peak El-Niño event of 1998, when mean global temperatures reached +0.45 degrees Celsius above pre-1975 levels, a decline of temperatures during 1999-2000 was heralded as “global cooling”, reversing the rise in mean temperature of about +0.8C since early in the 20th century (see figure 1).

Unfortunately from 2001 temperatures continued to rise. There were peak temperatures of +0.46C (2005) and +0.47C (2010) in the instrumental record (see figure 1). The 2011 La-Niña year saw the peak temperature of 0.4C higher than all previously recorded La-Niña years.

The rise in mean global temperature would be about double the above figures, had it not been for the transient masking effects of short-lived sulphur aerosols emitted from fossil fuel combustion. However, with the onset of clean air policies in the 1980s, SO₂ emissions began to decline (see figure 2), which in part explains the sharp rise in temperatures from about 1975-1976 (see figure 1).

Figure 1: NASA, the US National Climatic Data Centre, and the UK Hadley Centre have each produced global temperature datasets. The graph shows the annual means calculated from the three datasets. Years beginning with an El Niño (orange) and La Niña (blue) are shown. http://www.csiro.au/Outcomes/Climate/Understanding/State-of-the-Climate-2012.aspx

Click to enlarge

Factors underlying lower temperatures about 1999-2000 include the resurgence of sulphur emission from industry, in particular in growing economies (China, Middle East, Africa) (see figure 2). The role of the 11 years sun spot cycle is minor, contributing to temperature rise from the mid-1980s (1365.6 to 1366.5 Watt/m2) and to the relatively cool La-Niña dominated period during 2008 (see figure 3).

Typically the rise in global temperature is amplified in the polar regions by factors up to 4 and 5. Thus, of the parameters reflecting global warming, the state of the Arctic Sea ice is one of the most sensitive, often referred to as the “canary in the coal mine”.

Figure 2: Global industrial sulphur emissions during 1850 – 2010. www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/1101/2011/acp-11-1101-2011.pdf

Click to enlarge

The opening of a summer open-water ocean in the Arctic, absorbing infrared radiation where the electromagnetic spectrum was previously reflected back to space, is bound to have major implications for the global climate patterns. Since 2009, abrupt steepening of Arctic Sea ice melt rate (see figure 4), has led a group of UK scientists to call for urgent geo-engineering to cool the Arctic.

Such measures would likely hinge on stratospheric injection of sulphur dioxide from jet planes flying high over the Arctic, increasing atmospheric albedo for relatively short periods on time scales of weeks to months. Sulphur will need to be re-injected over the long term unless and until levels of atmospheric greenhouse gases decline.

Figure 3: Sun spot numbers between 1950 and 2011. http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/images/Zurich_Color_Small.jpg

Click to enlarge

So far as the carbon emissions are concerned, however, business as usual goes on and infrastructure of fossil fuel exploitation continues to be expanded in several parts of the world, including Australia’s coal mining and coal export industry. According to ABARE’s report “Australian coal exports outlook to 2025 and the role of infrastructure” (Table 8 of the report), Australia’s coal exports are due to grow from a total of 306 Million ton coal (MtCoal) in 2012 to 394 MtCoal in 2025. For an average grade of ~80% carbon in high-quality coal, this translates to between 245 MtCarbon in 2012 to 315 MtCarbon in 2025.

Annual emissions from Australian coal exports were near double the Australian annual carbon emissions during 1990-2008 (~420 to 550 MtCO₂-equivalent per year = 114 to 150 MtCarbon per year) (see figure 2.1 in Australian Greenhouse Emissions Information System).

Figure 4: Arctic sea ice volume anomaly from PIOMAS updated once a month. Daily Sea Ice volume anomalies for each day are computed relative to the 1979 to 2011 average for that day of the year. Tick marks on time axis refer to 1st day of year. The trend for the period 1979-present is shown in blue. Shaded areas show one and two standard deviations from the trend. Error bars indicate the uncertainty of the monthly anomaly. http://psc.apl.washington.edu/wordpress/research/projects/arctic-sea-ice-volume-anomaly/#

Click to enlarge

If local emissions for 2007 (540 MtCO₂ = 147 MtCarbon) (excluding land use-related carbon loss) are combined with 2007 emissions from Australian coal exports (262*0.8 = 210 MtCarbon) (Table 8), the total of ~357 MtCarbon constitutes ~4.5 percent of 2007 global emission of ~7900 MtCarbon. Quadrupling Australia’s coal exports would increase Australia’s total direct and indirect emissions to over 1 billion tons (1 GtCarbon).

Figure 5: Mouna Loa 1970 – 2012 trends in (A) CO2; (B) Methane; (C) 18O/16O (decreasing – representing relative increase in 16O and thereby rising temperatures), and (D) N2O. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/

Click to enlarge

Compared to total emissions from local combustion and exported coal, Australia’s carbon price – planned to reduce emissions by 5-25% by 2020 relative to 2000 emissions (2000 emissions – 500 MtCO₂ = 136 MtCarbon) – would bring emissions down to 129 or 102 MtC per year, respectively. Such reduction would be cancelled out by the growth in coal exports.

Global emissions since 1750, totalling 352,000 MtCarbon from combustion and 152,000 MtCarbon from land clearing, have driven atmospheric CO₂ levels to 393 ppm (see figure 5), the highest it has been since the Pliocene some 3 million years ago. Current CO₂ rise rates near 2 ppm CO₂/year are unprecedented in the last 65 million years of geological history.


Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.