In “Directions in Hydropower,” a newly issued exposition of the World Bank Group’s views on the value of hydropower, the bank said hydropower now is viewed as an integral factor in addressing energy security, climate change, water security and regional cooperation.

World Bank lending for hydropower bottomed out in 1999 due to growing opposition from environmental and other non-governmental organizations.

“There are risks inherent in development and operation of hydropower, many of which were the focus of passionate debate in the 1990s,” the bank said. “These risks cross the range of financial, geological, engineering and market concerns, with particular attention to environmental protection, resettlement, social inclusion and sharing of the benefits of development across all stakeholders.”

Triple Bottom-line Policy: Social, Environmental, Economic

As a consequence, the bank said, the definition of acceptable hydropower has shifted to one that recognizes core principles of sustainable development with attention to social and environmental, as well as economic “bottom lines.” It said the shift has been supported by a decade of better understanding and of developing best practices, safeguards and self-assessment measures from players including the World Bank, Equator Banks, International Hydropower Association, International Energy Agency, the World Commission on Dams and the United Nations Environment Program.

“The priority is shifting towards development ‘done right’ and comprehensive environmental management and benefits sharing,” the bank said.

In a stark change from a decade ago, World Bank lending now reflects a Water Resources Sector Strategy approved in 2003 that says significant levels of investment in water infrastructure are required throughout the developing world.

New lending for hydropower increased significantly, from less than US $250 million per year from 2002-2004, to US $500 million per year from 2005-2007. In fiscal year 2008, new lending for hydro exceeded US $1 billion.

The bank said 67 hydropower projects have been approved since fiscal year 2003, amounting to US $3.7 billion in World Bank Group contributions to support a total of US $8.5 billion and nearly 9,700 MW in project investments. Within those numbers, the bank noted, is money for rehabilitation of existing capacity at the 350-MW Inga 1 and 1,424-MW Inga 2 hydro projects in the Democratic Republic of Congo (HydroWorld 4/20/09) and of hydro plants totaling 1,338 MW in Niger. (HydroWorld 2/11/09)

Bank Sees Pipeline of US $2 Billion in Projects

Major hydro projects have been approved in Africa and Asia, as well as several rehabilitation projects in Eastern Europe. The bank said a range of new projects is under discussion in India, Vietnam, the Nile Equatorial Lakes Region, Ethiopia, Guinea, Brazil, Romania, Turkey, Georgia and Tajikistan. Bank-backed carbon finance projects are under discussion in Russia, Sri Lanka and Madagascar.

The bank’s two-track strategy of investment lending, and energy and water sector strengthening, has only just begun. The bank said it has identified a “promising pipeline” of US $2 billion in projects under preparation for the next several years, not including projects that are only under preliminary discussion with clients.

The World Bank report said total economically feasible potential hydro capacity in developing countries exceeds 1,900,000 MW, 70 percent of which, 1,330,000 MW, is not exploited. That is four times the current installed hydro capacity of Europe and North America and nearly double the 740,000 MW installed worldwide. It said significant additional amounts of energy and capacity are available from rehabilitation of existing hydropower and water resources assets.

“Directions in Hydropower” may be obtained from the World Bank’s Internet site or by clicking here http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWAT/Resources/Directions_in_Hydropower_FINAL.pdf.

John Braden is senior associate editor, Hydro Group, with PennWell Corporation. He has been covering hydro news for more than 20 years.

This article was reprinted with permission from the Hydro Group as part of the PennWell Corporation Renewable Energy World Network and may not be reproduced without express written permission from the publisher.