admin /5 October, 2006
Our climate has been been getting hotter and drier, with Perth’s rainfall declining by 21 per cent in the past half century. To secure water supplies, cities need to weigh a range of relatively expensive options, according to Malcolm Turnbull, Federal parliamentary secretary responsible for water, in The Australian (2/10/2006, p.14).
Climate-proof solution a plus: Generally, there were five main options for our big cities, Turnbull said. "First, recycling, either for indirect potable reuse, although this is contentious to say the least, or for substitution for potable water, as is proposed in Brisbane where recycled water would be used in power stations. Second, desalination, which is expensive but like recycling, has the great advantage of not being climate-dependent."
Political price to be paid: The third option — buying water from irrigators — often raised intense political and social questions, although it was proceeding in Adelaide and Perth, he said. The fourth and fifth options were harvesting more surface water by building new dams and piping it to the city, and accessing groundwater, which was really available on a large scale only in Perth.
New dams not the answer: "Brisbane is the only significant city planning to build new dams and they are contentious on both ecological and hydrological grounds. New dams are not a likely option in any of our other big cities and it must be said that in a hotter, drier climate there is much in favour of augmenting our water supplies from sources that are not climate dependent," Turnbull said.
Biggest storage matched by shortage: "Brisbane already has the largest storage capacity relative to demand of any Australian city and yet its water shortage is the most severe.
Distance may be key decider: "In every case, a key factor is the distance of the new water source from the city concerned. Recycling is a more feasible option in a city such as Adelaide where the treatment plants are close to horticultural areas that want to use the water produced. If the treatment plants are on the coast and the potential users are on the outskirts of the city, the transportation costs are a big factor.
Desal location bears on cost: "Desalination produces a highly saline brine stream that poses environmental problems, especially if it is disposed of in an estuary or bay. So for a city such as Melbourne, built on a bay, there would be a strong argument to site a desalination plant on the ocean that would result in added costs to connect with the main water supply network.
All possible for a price: "The bottom line for our cities is this: we can have as much water as we are prepared to pay for."
The Australian, 2/10/2006, p. 14
Source: Erisk Net