Category: Archive

Archived material from historical editions of The Generator

  • Demand for water tanks increases

    The drought is also increasing demand for water tanks from farmers.

    They are not being used to collect rainwater, but to hold water being trucked in to properties across Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and South Australia.

    Ross Hendy from Tankworld in north-west Victoria says around 250 tanks are being sold each week, and there is a six-week wait for them.

    "Instead of running one shift we are running two, we are currently looking at possibly running three and we are obviously putting more trucks on the road so we can get the product to our clients quicker," he said.

    © 2006 Australian Broadcasting Corporation
    Copyright information: http://abc.net.au/common/copyrigh.htm

  • In Case I Disappear

        It seems, perhaps, that the people who warned me were not so paranoid. It seems, perhaps, that I was not paranoid enough. Legislation passed by the Republican House and Senate, legislation now marching up to the Republican White House for signature, has shattered a number of bedrock legal protections for suspects, prisoners, and pretty much anyone else George W. Bush deems to be an enemy.

        So much of this legislation is wretched on the surface. Habeas corpus has been suspended for detainees suspected of terrorism or of aiding terrorism, so the Magna Carta-era rule that a person can face his accusers is now gone. Once a suspect has been thrown into prison, he does not have the right to a trial by his peers. Suspects cannot even stand in representation of themselves, another ancient protection, but must accept a military lawyer as their defender.

        Illegally-obtained evidence can be used against suspects, whether that illegal evidence was gathered abroad or right here at home. To my way of thinking, this pretty much eradicates our security in persons, houses, papers, and effects, as stated in the Fourth Amendment, against illegal searches and seizures.

        Speaking of collecting evidence, the torture of suspects and detainees has been broadly protected by this new legislation. While it tries to delineate what is and is not acceptable treatment of detainees, in the end, it gives George W. Bush the final word on what constitutes torture. US officials who use cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment to extract information from detainees are now shielded from prosecution.

        It was two Supreme Court decisions, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, that compelled the creation of this legislation. The Hamdi decision held that a prisoner has the right of habeas corpus, and can challenge his detention before an impartial judge. The Hamdan decision held that the military commissions set up to try detainees violated both the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions.

        In short, the Supreme Court wiped out virtually every legal argument the Bush administration put forth to defend its extraordinary and dangerous behavior. The passage of this legislation came after a scramble by Republicans to paper over the torture and murder of a number of detainees. As columnist Molly Ivins wrote on Wednesday, "Of the over 700 prisoners sent to Gitmo, only 10 have ever been formally charged with anything. Among other things, this bill is a CYA for torture of the innocent that has already taken place."

        It seems almost certain that, at some point, the Supreme Court will hear a case to challenge the legality of this legislation, but even this is questionable. If a detainee is not allowed access to a fair trial or to the evidence against him, how can he bring a legal challenge to a court? The legislation, in anticipation of court challenges like Hamdi and Hamdan, even includes severe restrictions on judicial review over the legislation itself.

        The Republicans in Congress have managed, at the behest of Mr. Bush, to draft a bill that all but erases the judicial branch of the government. Time will tell whether this aspect, along with all the others, will withstand legal challenges. If such a challenge comes, it will take time, and meanwhile there is this bill. All of the above is deplorable on its face, indefensible in a nation that prides itself on Constitutional rights, protections and the rule of law.

        Underneath all this, however, is where the paranoia sets in.

        Underneath all this is the definition of "enemy combatant" that has been established by this legislation. An "enemy combatant" is now no longer just someone captured "during an armed conflict" against our forces. Thanks to this legislation, George W. Bush is now able to designate as an "enemy combatant" anyone who has "purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States."

        Consider that language a moment. "Purposefully and materially supported hostilities against the United States" is in the eye of the beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other part of the so-called "War on Terror."

        If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them up.

        By writing this essay, I could be deemed an "enemy combatant." It’s that simple, and very soon, it will be the law. I always laughed when people told me to be careful. I’m not laughing anymore.

        In case I disappear, remember this. America is an idea, a dream, and that is all. We have borders and armies and citizens and commerce and industry, but all this merely makes us like every other nation on this Earth. What separates us is the idea, the simple idea, that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are our organizing principles. We can think as we please, speak as we please, write as we please, worship as we please, go where we please. We are protected from the kinds of tyranny that inspired our creation as a nation in the first place.

        That was the idea. That was the dream. It may all be over now, but once upon a time, it existed. No good idea ever truly dies. The dream was here, and so was I, and so were you.


        William Rivers Pitt is a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn’t Want You to Know and The Greatest Sedition Is Silence. His newest book, House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America’s Ravaged Reputation, will be available this winter from PoliPointPress.

     

  • OPEC embraces Greenhouse cleanup

    Great potential for CDM projects but short supply of CERs: Seiichiro Nishida, Mitsubishi UFJ Securities, in discussing public and private investments and the CDM project prospective, noted the great potential for CDM projects in the Middle East and the short supply of certified emission reductions (CERs) as compared to the high demand.

    Better to wait till issuing stage before finalising CER prices: Noting the incorporation of qualification and registration risks into CER prices, he suggested that it is often better to wait until a project has reached the issuing stage to avoid qualification risks.

    Need to increase profitability of CDM projects: Identifying “finance-related issues” as a key barrier to success, he highlighted the need to increase the profitability and fund-raising capacity of CDM projects.

    Need for supplemental mechanisms emphasised: On raising project profitability, he emphasized the need to monetize the environmental contribution to augment returns and that this requires supplemental mechanisms to the CDM, such as tax credits.

    CERs are form of foreign investment: Rachad Itani, Xenel-Balderrie Project Finance & Advisory, discussed his experience with CDM-enhanced projects in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East. He suggested that CERs are a form of inward foreign investment and that CDM-enhanced finance can provide a significant boost to the internal rate of return.

    CDM projects can reduce operating costs: He noted that of the six greenhouse gases (GHGs) covered by the Kyoto Protocol, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide provide the greatest value and, after outlining present and future projects, he noted that CDM projects are not simply ends in themselves but also means to reduce long-term operating costs.

    Reference: Summary of the First International Conference on the Clean Development Mechanism in Saudi Arabia and the EU-OPEC Roundtable on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: 19-21 September 2006, http://www.iisd.ca

    Erisk Net, 24/9/2006

  • Green buildings not expensive says survey


    Cost premium "small: Romilly Madew, chief executive of the Green Building Council, said the GBC’s cost-benefit analysis of green buildings The Dollars & Sense of Green Buildings showed that green buildings incur a small premium of no more than 3 per cent above the costs of standard construction. This made the cost of going green for CBD commercial building “less than $100 per square metre,” Ms Madew said.

    Momentum is there: BCI Australia chief executive officer Matthias Krups said that the results reflected the momentum in the industry to build green, but that manufacturers were slow to respond.

    Window of opportunity: “The results also point to a strategic window of opportunity for manufacturers’ branding and positioning, with ‘specifying green products’ ranking among the most common of green building activities, yet few if any architects are able to specifically put their finger on a ‘green manufacturer’,” Dr Krups said.

    Green building sales on rise: Among other findings in the survey: More than 50 per cent of Australia’s architectural firms and contractors see their sales associated with green building on the rise, yet 65 per cent of architects and contractors see ”little or no impact” of green building on their profits.

    The Australian Financial Review, 28/9/2006, p. 55