|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|

Managing director of Ebono Institute and major sponsor of The Generator, Geoff Ebbs, is running against Kevin Rudd in the seat of Griffith at the next Federal election. By the expression on their faces in this candid shot it looks like a pretty dull campaign. Read on
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|

6 island nations threatened by climate change
Mother Nature Network
Global sea levels are rising and the world’s land ice is disappearing. The Environmental Protection Agency notes that sea levels have risen 6 to 8 inches in the past 100 years, while NASA points out that Antarctica has been losing more than 100 cubic …
See all stories on this topic »
|
Inbox
|
x |
|
11:07 AM (40 minutes ago)
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
||||
Dear NEVILLE,
We just returned from London where we shot an exclusive interview with Julian Assange — his first Australian interview since he sought asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy.
Many GetUp members have been emailing with questions they wanted Mr Assange to answer, so we put your questions to him directly.
Click below to be the first to see this exclusive interview:
GetUp will always stand up for the rights of a democratic, free society; including freedom of speech, freedom of information and the right to a fair trial. That’s why we campaigned to bring David Hicks home after five years of detention and allegations of torture inside Guantanamo Bay. That’s why when members of Congress and the US media started labelling Assange a terrorist and calling for blood, more than 90,000 GetUp members chipped in to publish a full-page statement in The New York Times, headlined: “Wikileaks are not terrorists.”
Now Julian Assange is wanted for questioning concerning an alleged sexual assault in Sweden – allegations he must address, but can’t. Instead, he’s holed up inside the Ecuadorian embassy in the UK. If he steps out the door he fears he’ll simply be arrested and handed over to the US, where he faces life in prison and even the death penalty.
Wikileaks is a media organisation, but Mr Assange now faces the prospect of military prison in the United States for publishing information governments didn’t want heard. When our Government fails to take a stand for Mr Assange, they’re actually failing to fight for the freedom of our press.
Watch the exclusive interview, and add your name to our new petition.
Mr Assange’s fears that Sweden will hand him over to the US are not unfounded. Media reports have revealed that the US have already made plans to charge Mr Assange with espionage, in a military court — the same military system that has now detained Bradley Manning without charge for over 800 days.
Swedish authorities could simply interview Mr Assange where he is, but forcing him to go back to Sweden means he will be incarcerated instantly. He could then could be extradited under a bilateral agreement to the US, before he’s had a chance to even deal with the allegations of sexual assault. In this interview, Mr Assange says he wants to defend himself in relation to the Swedish allegations.
Whatever happens – we know where we stand. We campaign not to be the judge of someone’s innocence or guilt, but to defend the bedrock laws and values that underpin freedom and justice for everyone. These are the very rights that separate us from petty dictatorships around the world – where the act of publishing information the government doesn’t want seen gets you thrown into jail, or worse.
When we first published our NY Times statement, we promised that we would “continue to fight for free speech, a free press and freedom of information in a global, modern and interconnected world“; and that we would, “continue to stand up for the rule of law, due process and the democratic values that are often threatened in times of uncertainty.”
That hasn’t changed. Thank you for being part of this: www.getup.org.au/free-speech.
In hope,
the GetUp team.
GetUp is an independent, not-for-profit community campaigning group. We use new technology to empower Australians to have their say on important national issues. We receive no political party or government funding, and every campaign we run is entirely supported by voluntary donations. If you’d like to contribute to help fund GetUp’s work, please donate now! If you have trouble with any links in this email, please go directly to www.getup.org.au. To unsubscribe from GetUp, please click here. Authorised by Sam Mclean, Level 2, 104 Commonwealth Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010. ![]()
Shutdown … instead of a second harbour crossing, the Infrastructure NSW strategy recommends upgrading track, stations and signalling. Photo: Andrew Meares
TRAIN services into central Sydney would be shut for months and restricted for years under plans by Infrastructure NSW to avoid building a second rail crossing over Sydney Harbour.
That is according to analysis by Transport for NSW which, for half a decade, has been trying to avoid the cost of the crossing estimated at $10 billion.
The shutdown, which would affect the daily commute of tens of thousands of workers, would be needed under plans to upgrade stations in the central business district and track infrastructure. The objective would be to run up to 30 single-deck trains an hour instead of the 20 double-deckers it can run now.
The department and the Transport Minister, Gladys Berejiklian, rejected this idea only in May after deciding the disruption would not be worth the benefit.
Train commuters to the CBD would need to be dropped off on either side of the city – at Redfern, Chatswood or North Sydney – and taken by bus to the city. A limited service would remain for years.
The idea was revived last week as part of Infrastructure NSW’s 20-year strategy. Infrastructure NSW, set up as an independent adviser to the government, disputes the analysis. It says its job is to challenge a bias in Transport for NSW towards new infrastructure such as another harbour crossing.
”The general focus of the NSW transport bureaucracy over a very long time has been about building stuff,” the chairman of Infrastructure NSW, Nick Greiner, said last week. He wants to eke more out of the existing network. ”No matter where you come out you cannot believe that the existing thing is run anywhere near capacity,” he said.
Mr Greiner’s plan rejected the idea of adding to the city’s train system in the next two decades, beyond the north-west and south-west rail links.
Instead of a second harbour crossing, which Transport for NSW now says is necessary, the strategy recommends spending $5 billion in the next 20 years upgrading track, stations and signalling between the city and the lower north shore to allow more single-deck trains to cross the Harbour Bridge. It says the work could be carried out largely while trains were still running.
But the proposal echoes those being developed within Transport for NSW since at least 2008, which it has ruled out because of the disruption they would cause.
Analysis the Herald has obtained shows Transport for NSW concluded that for about ”four years there will be significant changes to the network operation in the CBD, with major disruption to operations, including no City Circle services from Central to Wynyard for three to four years (option dependent)”.
In fact, the disruption could be more intensive under the proposal by Infrastructure NSW.
The Transport for NSW proposal assumed the construction of a ”city relief line” or extra tracks between Redfern and Wynyard. These would help mitigate the impact on services while the existing tracks were overhauled and rerouted. But Infrastructure NSW proposes no spending on new CBD tracks for the next 20 years.
Switching to single-deck trains may sound simple but getting any extra capacity out of smaller trains with more doors would require rebuilding Wynyard and Town Hall station platforms.
It would also require closing lines so the complicated criss-cross of tracks between Redfern and Central could be rebuilt. Infrastructure NSW acknowledges that ”junction remodelling” would be needed to link the inner west and north shore lines south of Central.
Internal Transport for NSW documents say the work would cause a big disruption on all lines for three to four years.
|
||
| Supes to look at sea level rise; board considering administrative officer … Times-Standard The supervisors are being asked to send a letter to the state Coastal Conservancy supporting a $10,000 grant to the nonprofit Coastal Ecosystems Institute of Northern California for the adaptation planning and technical studies associated with sea … See all stories on this topic » |
||
| Photos: Blackwater drowning even faster Delmarva Daily Times Images released last week by the NASA Earth Observatory show stark shifts in the landscape since the mid-1980s from the combined effects of sea level rise, subsiding land and voracious nutria and geese. Tidal marshlands, depicted in reddish-brown hues, … See all stories on this topic » |
|
||
| Irreversible Warming Will Cause Sea Levels to Rise for Thousands … Irreversible Warming Will Cause Sea Levels to Rise for Thousands of Years to Come, New Research Shows enlarge. An irreversible warming of Earth will cause … atheistfoundation.org.au/forums/showthread.php?t=15738 |
Tip: Use quotes (“like this”) around a set of words in your query to match them exactly. Learn more.
Delete this alert.
Create another alert.
Manage your alerts.
Hi Neville,
Ice sheets have been collapsing during interglacial stages over the last 800,000 years.
There is no relation to the present situation, we have been in an interglacial (the Holocene) since about 10,000 years ago – global warming since 1750 is occurring on top of the Holocene.