Author: Neville

  • Coalition cuts Labor, Greens Parliament staff

    Coalition cuts Labor, Greens Parliament staff

    Date
    December 29, 2013
    • 30 reading now
    Bianca Hall

    Bianca Hall is political correspondent

    You can tell a lot about a government’s priorities by what is kept and what is canned in a tight economic environment.

    Among the federal government’s latest cuts, as it grapples with a budget blowout of more than $17 billion, are staff for the opposition, Greens and cross-bench MPs.

    In 2010, Labor had approved its opposite numbers hiring 72 extra staff, at a cost of $54.2 million, to help them navigate legislation in a challenging minority government environment.

    But with a comfortable electoral win under its belt, the Coalition will save $6 million over four years by cutting non-government staffing levels to pre-2010 levels.

    Advertisement

    Since coming to office on September 7, the Coalition has cut billions of dollars in programs, including $1.1 billion it will save by abandoning grants promised by the Labor government, announced this month in its mid-year economic statement.

    Treasurer Joe Hockey’s office cannot provide a comprehensive list of the grants programs it has cut, and a spokeswoman says no estimates have been made of the jobs to be lost due to the cuts.

    Among the casualties are a host of advisory boards and their part-time representatives deemed to have outlived their usefulness, with $43 million stripped from programs delivering policy reform and advocacy activities.

    A spokesman for the Community and Public Sector Union says it’s impossible to know how many jobs will be lost, because of the ”conspicuous absence” of hard data in the mid-year financial statement.

    The government came to power promising to cut 12,000 public service jobs through natural attrition.

    But Finance Minister Matthias Cormann said last month the government had discovered Labor had ”hidden” its own plans to cut 14,500 jobs over the next four years, making achieving the target through voluntary departures hard.

    A Fairfax analysis of the savings announced in the mid-year economic statement shows hundreds of jobs and volunteer positions will be lost as the government grapples with a budget blowout of more than $17 billion on top of the promised public service job cuts.

    Some of them will be jobs in name only, having been announced by Labor then cut by the government before anyone had a chance to actually do the jobs.

    These include ”live music ambassadors” who were to head the $560,000 national office for live music announced by former prime minister Kevin Rudd during the election campaign.

    Also given the chop is the person who would have become the independent inspector general of animal welfare and live animal exports (saving $3.9 million over four years). But most of the job losses will be felt by real people.

    The Alcohol and Other Drugs Council of Australia, which had operated since 1966, went into administration after it learnt last month that its funding would cease immediately.

    The council was the peak body for organisations working to minimise the harm caused by drugs and alcohol, providing professional development, information sharing and advocacy services on an annual budget of $1.6 million from the federal Health Department.

    The position of co-ordinator general for remote indigenous services, now held by Brian Gleeson, will be axed when Mr Gleeson retires in January, saving $7.1 million over three years.

    Also losing their jobs are an unknown number of Aboriginal legal aid policy workers.

    Members of the advisory panel on the economic portrayal of senior Australians – Everald Compton, Gill Lewin and Brian Howe – will also go, saving $958,000 over two years.

    The ABC’s Insiders host Barrie Cassidy, who was appointed chairman of the Old Parliament House advisory council, has handed in his resignation after the Coalition asked him to step down from the voluntary position. The government appointed former Howard government minister David Kemp in his place.

    Then there are 38 university graduates who accepted jobs in the prestigious AusAID graduate program, only to be told the program had been scrapped.

    Other groups that have gone are the Climate Commission (now operating as the donor-funded Climate Council) and the Climate Change Authority. The Clean Energy Finance Corporation also faces an uncertain future.

    The First People Education Advisory Group, comprising indigenous academics and education experts, also will no longer receive funding.

    A dozen non-statutory bodies, advising on everything from animal welfare to ageing, will be abolished while a further three will be amalgamated with other non-statutory bodies and five will be absorbed by portfolio departments.

    Funding change slams door on multicultural men’s shed

    It was going to be Australia’s first multicultural men’s shed. A place for about 80 elderly postwar migrants and new migrants to spend time tinkering with hands-on projects and talking to each other.

    As well as supporting other blokes in the shed, the men would have been involved in a pilot ”in-home maintenance program”, going into the community to fix windows, change light bulbs and perform household tasks for residents too frail or elderly to perform them themselves and all for a gold coin donation.

    Newcastle Ethnic Communities Council executive officer John Tucker spent six weeks on the proposal. His organisation submitted a successful development application to Newcastle City Council and spent about $30,000 on plans and preliminary works.

    But the plan – which would have cost $159,000 to complete, employed dozens of local tradesmen and has the support of the NSW government, which kicked in $40,000 – is one of hundreds of community projects abruptly stripped of funds by the federal government in the final weeks of the year.

    ”It was funded under the previous government’s budget, so it was already money spent,” Mr Tucker said. ”It was a legitimate, legal, legitimately applied for grant, so it’s just really disappointing.

  • Giant ‘Battery’ Can Store Renewable Energy

    Giant ‘Battery’ Can Store Renewable Energy

    • Published: December 23rd, 2013

    Repost This

    By Paul Brown, Climate News Network

    LONDON – Norwegian hydropower schemes linked to Europe’s large wind farm projects could successfully act as a backup when wind power fails to deliver enough energy, according to SINTEF, the largest independent Scandinavian research organization.

    Smøla Wind Farm is a 68 turbine wind farm located on the island of Smøla in Norway. Researchers say energy from surplus wind power will provide “battery” power to even out energy supply & demand. Credit: Flickr/Statkraft

    With both on- and off-shore wind power being seen as key to reducing the EU’s carbon emissions by 80-95 percent by 2050, a big hurdle for the technology is solving the problem of intermittent power production. Sometimes there will be too much power on offer, and at others too little.

    A northern European offshore power grid is being developed to link wind farms and carry the electricity to population centers where it is needed in Sweden, Denmark and Germany. But the key problem remains how to maintain a regular supply of energy.

    If the existing Norwegian hydropower schemes were refurbished and updated and connected to the same grid they could act as a giant “blue-green battery” for the system and provide all the necessary backup power, according to SINTEF.

    Goodbye Coal!

    The potential for wind power in northern Europe is huge. There are already 3.8 gigawatts of installed wind power, replacing four coal-fired power plants. According to the European Union this is expected to rise to 150 gigawatts between 2030 and 2050, the equivalent of 150 medium-sized coal-fired power stations.

    Although there are always variations in wind speed, clever use of the grid system, linking to other renewables like biogas and other back-up gas stations, evens up supply. One way of dealing with electricity surpluses, for example from nuclear power stations that have to run 24 hours a day and produce power at night that no-one needs, is to use the electricity to pump water uphill into reservoirs. This water can be released and used for hydropower during daytime peaks. This system is called pumped storage.

    Green Battery

    This is exactly SINTEF’s idea, but on a larger scale. Norwegian reservoirs could be constantly recharged with water delivered by electricity generated by surplus wind power, with the water power used as a “green” battery in times of shortage.

    “If this large wind project is to succeed, we must secure stable electricity supplies”, says Daniel Huertas-Hernando at SINTEF. “Today, forecasts of wind velocities provide the only information which gives us any indication of power generation levels from wind farms for the next 24 hours.

    “If these prognoses turn out to be wrong, or if bad weather makes generation from the turbines impossible, we will need an effective stand-by source which can fill the energy supply gap at short notice.

    The Dinorwig pumped storage station at Llanveris, North Wales. The potential of Norwegian hydropower plants could provide adequate backup.
    Credit: Jim Barton, Wikimedia Commons via Climate News Network

    “This is exactly what Norwegian hydropower can do, because it makes it possible to store energy which can then be released on tap as and when it is needed,” he said.

    By refurbishing existing plants and installing pump storage, the research shows, the potential of Norwegian hydropower plants could be increased by between 11 and 18 gigawatts, enough to provide adequate backup.

    The next question the researchers are looking at is how to integrate all this into the European grid so that the system is cost-effective. An EU project called Twenties is looking at large-scale stable renewable energy for the EU.

    Peaks and Troughs

    Some renewables like solar, which are also intermittent, pose less of a problem because peak production is around mid-day when energy use is at its highest. This has already led to peak wholesale prices being reduced in countries like Germany and Italy where there are large-scale solar installations.

    Wind is less predictable. The problem is to work out how best to use the output to even out production peaks and troughs before final decisions on a distribution network are taken.

    There are already grid connections between countries, for example to export surplus nuclear power from France to Germany, Italy and the UK. Surplus wind power from Denmark is exported, and Norway can sometimes offer spare hydropower.

    “So far the only power cables we have extending directly between different countries are the so-called ‘cross-border trading cables,’” says Huertas-Hernando. He says what is needed is a grid development strategy across Europe to even out supply and demand.

    “Since grid construction takes such a long time, it’s important to find the answer to this question now, so that we can plan in time,” he said.

    Paul Brown is a joint editor for Climate News Network. Climate News Network is a news service led by four veteran British environmental reporters and broadcasters. It delivers news and commentary about climate change for free to media outlets worldwide.

    Comments

    By Eric Peterson (Front Royal, VA 22630r)
    on December 25th, 2013

    “There are already 3.8 gigawatts of installed wind power, replacing four coal-fired power plants”

    Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_the_European_Union says 105 GW.  In the same page it says Germany generated 35,500 GWh in a year (2010) which is 4 GWh per hour or 4 GW.  Their installed capacity in 2010 was 27 GW so their capacity factor was about 15%.  Using that factor and the 105 total GW of capacity I get 15 GW of installed wind power practically speaking.  Another wikipedia page shows that most coal electric power plants are between 2 and 5 GW.

    Bottom line “replacing four coal-fired power plants” appears to be a correct statement although the numbers behind that statement are different from what I found.

    Reply to this comment

    By SaveNaturefree (Cairns Queensland)
    on December 25th, 2013

    The solution has always been small local generation from solar wind and river currents, What make the solution difficult is money.

    Reply to this comment

    By kermit
    on December 26th, 2013

    SaveNatureFree – yes, but the money for renewable generation is there. It’s no more expensive to replace coal and oil plants with renewable energy plants as they die off than it is to build new ones. The problem is the money being spent on misinformation and buying legislation to protect old and destructive energy technologies.

    It’s true a smart grid will cost us money, but it saves in the long run. It will save us money whatever the source of electricity are, on in what proportions. We cannot consider the cost of anything without considering the cost of alternatives. Soon – if not already – it will not be possible to fix the damage done.

    Reply to this comment

    By Patricia R. Pearl (Sarasota, Florida 34234)
    on December 27th, 2013

    The use of water towers filed by excess wind generated power to generate electricity is a great idea!
    Here is another great idea from the United Kingdom. It is the use of liquefied air to generate electricity. The air is liquefied during the night when the electricity from the wind turbines is “not needed”.  Then the “liquefied air” is ever so slightly warmed. The gas, having expanded the material about 700 times, is under great pressure. It spins a turbine which generates electricity when it is needed.
    The URL:
    http://highview-power.com/wordpress/
    Both ideas will be more and more useful in the future.
    There is a great solar installation in the Mohave Desert which stores energy as molten salt. The company is called Bright Source. The molten salt generates steam which spins turbines at night, generating electricity.
    The URL:
    http://www.brightsourceenergy.com/
    The molten salt is also a useful technology.
    The variety of ways to store energy is interesting. Cold, wet and gravity, and heat….hmmmmm. It makes me wonder about the next technology, the technology we have not heard of yet………..

    Reply to this comment

    Name (required):
    Email (required):
    City/State/Zip:
    Enter the word “climate” in the box below:

    [+] View our comment guidelines.

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until reviewed by Climate Central staff. Thank you for your patience.

  • John Pilger: Mandela’s gone, but apartheid lives in Australia

    John Pilger: Mandela’s gone, but apartheid lives in Australia

    Thursday, December 26, 2013

    In the late 1960s, I was given an usual assignment by the London Daily Mirror‘s editor in chief, Hugh Cudlipp. I was to return to my homeland, Australia, and “discover what lies behind the sunny face”.

    The Mirror had been an indefatigable campaigner against apartheid in South Africa, where I had reported from behind the “sunny face”. As an Australian, I had been welcomed into this bastion of white supremacy. “We admire you Aussies,” people would say. “You know how to deal with your blacks.”

    I was offended, of course, but I also knew that only the Indian Ocean separated the racial attitudes of the two colonial nations. What I was not aware of was how the similarity caused such suffering among the original people of my own country.

    Growing up, my school books had made clear, to quote one historian: “We are civilised, and they are not.” I remember how a few talented Aboriginal Rugby League players were allowed their glory as long as they never mentioned their people.

    Eddie Gilbert, the great Aboriginal cricketer, the man who bowled Don Bradman for a duck, was to be prevented from playing again. That was not untypical.

    In 1969, I flew to Alice Springs in the red heart of Australia and met Charlie Perkins. At a time when Aboriginal people were not even counted in the census — unlike the sheep — Charlie was only the second Aborigine to get a university degree.

    He had made good use of this distinction by leading “freedom rides” into racially segregated towns in the outback of New South Wales. He got the idea from the freedom riders who went into the Deep South of the United States.

    We hired an old Ford, picked up Charlie’s mother Hetti, an elder of the Aranda people, and headed for what Charlie described as “hell”. This was Jay Creek, a “native reserve”, where hundreds of Aboriginal people were corralled in conditions I had seen in Africa and India.

    One outside tap trickled brown; there was no sanitation; the food, or “rations”, was starch and sugar. The children had stick-thin legs and the distended bellies of malnutrition.

    What struck me was the number of grieving mothers and grandmothers — bereft at the theft of children by the police and “welfare” authorities who, for years, had taken away those infants with lighter skin. The policy was “assimilation”. Today, this has changed only in name and rationale.

    The boys would end up working on white-run farms, the girls as servants in middle-class homes. This was undeclared slave labour. They were known as the Stolen Generation.

    Hetti Perkins told me that when Charlie was an infant she had kept him tied to her back, and would hide whenever she heard the hoofs of the police horses. “They didn’t get him,” she said, with pride.

    In 2008, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd apologised for this crime against humanity. Older Aboriginal people were grateful; they believed that Australia’s first people — the most enduring human presence on earth — might finally receive the justice and recognition they had been denied for 220 years.

    What few of them heard was the postscript to Rudd’s apology. “I want to be blunt about this,” he said. “There will be no compensation.”

    That 100,000 people deeply wronged and scarred by vicious racism — the product of a form of the eugenics movement with its links to fascism — would be given no opportunity to materially restore their lives was shocking, though not surprising. Most governments in Canberra, conservative or Labor, have insinuated that the First Australians are to blame for their suffering and poverty.

    When the Labor government in the 1980s promised “full restitution” and land rights, the powerful mining lobby went on the attack, spending millions campaigning on the theme that “the blacks” would “take over your beaches and barbies”. The government capitulated, even though the lie was farcical; Aboriginal people comprise barely 3% of the Australian population.

    Today, Aboriginal children are again being stolen from their families. The bureaucratic words are “removed” for “child protection”. By July 2012, there were 13,299 Aboriginal children in institutions or handed over to white families. Today, the theft of these children is now higher than at any time during the last century.

    I have interviewed numerous specialists in child care who regard this as a second stolen generation. “Many of the kids never see their mothers and communities again,” Olga Havnen, the author of a report for the Northern Territory government, told me. “In the Northern Territory, $80 million was spent on surveillance and removing kids, and less than $500,000 on supporting these impoverished families.

    “Families are often given no warning and have no idea where their children are being taken. The reason given is neglect — which means poverty. This is destroying Aboriginal culture and is racist. If apartheid South Africa had done this, there would have been an uproar.”

    In the town of Wilcannia, New South Wales, the life expectancy of Aborigines is 37 — lower than the Central African Republic, perhaps the poorest country on earth, currently racked by civil war.

    Wilcannia’s other distinction is that the Cuban government runs a literacy programme there, teaching young Aboriginal children to read and write. This is what the Cubans are famous for — in the world’s poorest countries. Australia is one of the world’s richest countries.

    I filmed similar conditions 28 years ago when I made my first film about indigenous Australia, The Secret Country. Vince Forrester, an Aboriginal elder I interviewed then, appears in my new film, Utopia. He guided me through a house in Mutitjulu where 32 people lived, mostly children, many of them suffering from otitis media, an infectious, entirely preventable disease that impairs hearing and speech.

    “Seventy per cent of the children in this house are partially deaf,” he said. Turning straight to my camera, he said, “Australians, this is what we call an abuse of human rights.”

    The majority of Australians are rarely confronted with their nation’s dirtiest secret. In 2009, the respected United Nations Special Rapporteur, Professor James Anaya, witnessed similar conditions and described government “intervention” policies as racist.

    The then-minister for Indigenous health, Tony Abbott, told him to “get a life” and stop listening to “the victim brigade”. Abbott is now prime minister.

    In Western Australia, minerals are being dug up from Aboriginal land and shipped to China for a profit of a billion dollars a week. In this, the richest, “booming” state, the prisons bulge with stricken Aboriginal people, including juveniles whose mothers stand at the prison gates, pleading for their release. The incarceration of black Australians here is eight times that of black South Africans during the last decade of apartheid.

    When Nelson Mandela was buried this week, his struggle against apartheid was duly celebrated in Australia, though the irony was missing.

    Apartheid was defeated largely by a global campaign from which the South African regime never recovered. Similar opprobrium has seldom found its mark in Australia, principally because the Aboriginal population is so small and Australian governments have been successful in dividing and co-opting a disparate leadership with gestures and vacuous promises.

    That may well be changing. A resistance is growing, yet again, in the Aboriginal heartland, especially among the young.

    Unlike the US, Canada and New Zealand, which have made treaties with their first people, Australia has offered gestures often wrapped in the law. However, in the 21st century the outside world is starting to pay attention. The specter of Mandela’s South Africa is a warning.

    [Reprinted from www.johpilger.com. John Pigler’s new documentary on Aboriginal Australia, Utopia, will be released in January.

    On Friday 17 January, there will be free open-air screening at the Block in Redfern, Sydney, starting at 7pm on the corner of Eveleigh & Caroline streets.

    Utopia will be launched in Australia at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Sydney, with screenings from 21-23 January and on Australia Day, 26 January. For information visit mca.com.au

    On 25 January, Utopia will be screened in Alice Springs at the Aaraluen Arts Centre. Contact Marlene Hodder on mhodder@rocketmail.com

     

  • Never-Seen-Before ‘Massive Lake’ Trapped Under Greenland Ice!

    Editor’s Picks

    • Never-Seen-Before ‘Massive Lake’ Trapped Under Greenland ice

    Most RECENT ARCHIVES

    • Mysterious Underground Lake Found In Greenland! [Video]
    NEWS

    Never-Seen-Before ‘Massive Lake’ Trapped Under Greenland Ice!

    Dec 23, 2013 09:44 PM EST

    A massive reservoir of melt water is trapped underneath the frozen landscape of the Greenland ice sheet, where temperatures often hover below zero degrees Fahrenheit, according to new analysis.

    Researchers from the University of Utah discovered the huge aquifer while drilling for core samples in 2011.

    The gigantic reservoir was found to be roughly 27,000 square miles, an area about the size of Ireland, the researchers using ice-penetrating radar.

    Like Us on Facebook

    The find could have major implications for understanding sea level rise.

    During two drills, when researchers pulled up the equipment, it was pouring liquid water, despite air temperatures in the area were around minus 4 degrees Fahrenheit. The water was found at a depth of 33 feet in the first drill and 82 feet in the second, according to the study published Sunday in the journal Nature Geoscience.

    “This discovery was a surprise,” Rick Forster, lead author and professor of geography at the University of Utah, said in a statement. “Instead of the water being stored in the air space between subsurface rock particles, the water is stored in the air space between the ice particles, like the juice in a snow cone.”

    Generally, the researchers found layers of dry snow in a drilling expedition. Moreover, it was early spring, so there was no possibility for surface melt to seep in through the cracks. Therefore, researchers concluded that the water remained trapped underneath the surface year-round.

    “Of the current sea level rise, the Greenland Ice Sheet is the largest contributor – and it is melting at record levels,” Forster said. “So understanding the aquifer’s capacity to store water from year to year is important because it fills a major gap in the overall equation of meltwater runoff and sea levels.”

    National Geographic reported earlier that the global sea levels have risen drastically over the last few decades. In fact, in the 1990s alone, Earth’s oceans have risen by .14 inches, which is twice faster that the level rise rates of the 1980s.

    Rising sea levels are the consequences of three major factors.

    The first is thermal expansion, which occurs as water heats up; the second is melting ice caps and glaciers; and the third is ice loss from Greenland and West Antarctica.

    Greenland ice sheet lost 34 billion tons of ice per year between 1992 and 2001, BBC noted. That amount increased to 215 billion tons between 2002 and 2011. The new discovery could mean that a good amount of this melted ice is being stored under the ice sheets.

    The new research suggests that a significant amount of the melt is still being stored within the Greenland ice sheet. If the melt water is allowed to escape, it could contribute greatly to global sea level rise.

    “Most models assume water runs off or refreezes,” Forster told Discovery News. “Is this water buffering sea-level rise? Or is it already connected and passing through and there’s just a delay? Right now we don’t know. It may be something in between.”

    “We don’t know the answer to this right now. It’s massive, it’s a new system we haven’t seen before – we need to understand it more completely if we are to predict sea level rise,” he added in a statement.

  • Lung cancer: A cloud on China’s polluted horizon

    Lung cancer: A cloud on China’s polluted horizon

    China’s doctors are beginning to speak of a link between air pollution and lung cancer. Children as young as 8 have been treated.

    • Email
      Share
      0
    Air pollution in ShanghaiA man flies a kite in Shanghai. This month, the city had an air pollution reading of 500 for the first time, prompting authorities to order children and the elderly to remain indoors. Beijing and other parts of northern China have pollution that is even higher. (ChinaFotoPress / Getty Images / December 5, 2013)
    By Barbara DemickDecember 24, 2013, 4:00 a.m.

    BEIJING — The youngest known lung cancer patient in eastern China is an 8-year-old girl whose home is next to a dust-choked road in heavily industrialized Jiangsu province.

    Another patient was a 14-year-old girl from Shanghai, the daughter of two nonsmokers with no family history of lung cancer.

    Back in the 1970s, when Bai Chunxue was in medical school, the textbook lung cancer patient was a chain-smoking male in his 60s. Nowadays, Bai, one of the physicians who treated the teen, sees so many who are still in their 20s that the cases blend together.

    “When I see patients who are not smokers with no other risk factors, we have to assume that the most probable cause is pollution,” said Bai, who works at Shanghai’s Zhongshan Hospital and is chairman of the Shanghai Respiratory Research Institute.

    Increasingly, other Chinese physicians are reaching the same conclusion. At a time when cigarette smoking is on the decline in China, the nation is facing an explosion of lung cancer cases.

    From 2002 to 2011, the incidence of lung cancer in Beijing rose to 63 cases per 100,000, from 39.6, according to municipal health authorities. Nationwide in the last three decades, an era in which China opened up its economy and industrialized, deaths from lung cancer have risen 465%.

    In a country that manufactures 1.7 trillion cigarettes a year, smoking is still cited as the leading cause of lung cancer. But these days, only about half of Chinese men smoke, down from 63% in 1996.

    The additional culprit, doctors believe, is the fine particulate matter known as PM 2.5, the microscopic particles from exhaust, coal smoke and vehicle fumes that can burrow their way into lungs.

    Readings in Beijing and elsewhere in northern China frequently climb straight off the chart devised by the World Health Organization, which classifies particulate levels between 300 and 500 micrograms per cubic meter as hazardous.

    The northeastern city of Harbin practically closed down for two days in October when readings approached 1,000, creating air so murky that residents said they couldn’t see their dogs at the end of the leash.

    The episode was reminiscent of the famous London smog of December 1952, when deadly pollution caused in large part by the burning of coal lasted for five days, leading to an estimated 12,000 premature deaths, according to a 2002 study by British health officials.

    As with London, the Harbin “airpocalypse,” as it was dubbed, was caused mostly by coal, which remains the major heating source in China. In January, Beijing experienced levels of pollution nearly as high; this month, far-less-polluted Shanghai hit the 500 level for the first time, prompting authorities to order children and the elderly to remain indoors.

    Although China’s Communist Party is more candid about pollution than it used to be, the topic remains a sensitive one. Many Chinese doctors and researchers turn down requests for interviews, saying it’s too risky to speak to foreign journalists.

    Wei Zhang, a Chinese-born cancer researcher at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, said he was stunned that so few speakers mentioned pollution at a major conference on cancer last month in Tianjin.

    “In the plenary session, I think I was the only person who brought up the term ‘air pollution,’” Zhang said.

    “Ten years ago, it was sensitive to talk about smoking because the tobacco industry was so important to the Chinese economy. Now it feels safe to talk about smoking. But for pollution, people are not prepared to talk about it,” he said.

    Though the Chinese news media are replete with stories about pollution, connecting the dots between dirty air and the rising cancer rate is risky. The doctor who first disclosed the case of the 8-year-old girl with lung cancer last month to a reporter from the state-run China News Service appears to have been publicly silenced.

    “There was a misunderstanding. I can’t do an interview,” said Feng Dongjie of the Jiangsu Province Tumor Hospital in Nanjing.

    Researchers at Fudan University School of Public Health in Shanghai were chastised last month for reporting on an experiment in which water contaminated with fine particulate matter was injected into the lungs of laboratory rats.

    Photos of the blackened lungs went viral on Chinese social media sites before China’s state media jumped in, running large editorials attacking the researchers for injecting the solution rather than letting the mice breathe polluted air.

  • World first Russia begins pumping oil from Arctic seabed Jeremy Hance

    mongabay.com logo NEWS MAP  |  FACEBOOK  |  TWITTER  |  RSS  |  DONATE

    World first: Russia begins pumping oil from Arctic seabed

    Jeremy Hance
    mongabay.com
    December 23, 2013

     

    print


    Oil has begun to be pumped from the Arctic seabed, according to Russian oil giant, Gazprom. The company announced on Friday that it has begun exploiting oil reserves at the offshore field of Prirazlomnoye. The project, which is several years behind schedule, is hugely controversial and made international headlines in September after Russian military arrested 28 Greenpeace activists protesting the operation along with a British journalist and Russian videographer.

    “This is the first project in Russia’s history aimed at developing the resources of the Arctic shelf and the start of large-scale work by Gazprom that will create a major hydrocarbons production centre in the region,” Gazprom, a Russian national company, said in a statement.

    Initially charged with “piracy” and then “hooliganism,” the Greenpeace activists and journalists were held in jail for two months, before being granted amnesty this week by Russian President, Vladimir Putin.

     

    CAPTION
    Red dot marks approximate location of Gazprom’s Prirazlomnoye platform in the Russian Arctic. Large islands above it are Severny Island and Yuzhny Island. Photo courtesy of NASA.

    Greenpeace, along with many other environmental groups, have condemned oil companies and governments for pursuing fossil fuels production in the Arctic, contending that no company in the world has the capacity to deal with an oil spill in such harsh and extreme conditions. Gazprom plans to drill for oil year-round, despite Arctic sea ice for much of the year and temperatures hitting -50 degrees Celsius (-58 degrees Fahrenheit).

    One of activists arrested, Faiza Oulahsen, called the news a “dark day for the Arctic,” adding that, “Gazprom is the first company on Earth to pump oil from beneath icy Arctic waters and yet its safety record on land is appalling. It is impossible to trust them to drill safely in one of the most fragile and beautiful regions on Earth. This is why I have spent the last two months of my life in jail, but I am just one of millions who oppose this reckless oil rush.”

    However, Gazprom has said it has taken all the necessary precautions to deal with a spill.

    Last year, Shell abandoned exploratory drilling in the Arctic after a series of mishaps, though it has recently stated it intends to try again. Shell has dropped $4 billion on attempts to exploit Arctic oil deposits.

    The Arctic is changing dramatically due to global climate change. Seasonal sea ice is shrinking and thinning as temperatures in the region rise faster in the region than anywhere else in the world. Scientists say that these changes imperil not only iconic wildlife in the region, but locals and indigenous people. Recent research has also tentatively linked the vanishing sea ice to extreme weather patterns worldwide.

    Earlier this year, scientists with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) outlined a global carbon budget, which found that if the world is to avoid catastrophic climate change and meet the goals agreed on by governments, most of the world’s remaining fossil fuel deposits must be left untouched

    Read more at http://news.mongabay.com/2013/1223-hance-russia-arctic-oil.html#z5tfC3SotA8mW6Wf.99