Category: Archive

Archived material from historical editions of The Generator

  • Record January temperatures hit NSW

    Volatile temperatures only slightly above average: Lacy said
    although temperatures had been volatile, the average at Griffith from
    October 15 to the end of December at 20 degrees had been only slightly
    above the long-term average of 19.7.

    Local irrigation approaches channel capacity, evaporation rates range from 10 to 16 mm per day:
    Murray Irrigation general manager George Warne said hot weather and
    high evaporation has caused local irrigation demand to approach channel
    capacity for the first time in four years. He said there had been three
    days with temperatures above 40 degrees in the week and evaporation
    rates at the Tullakool and Finley weather stations had ranged between
    10 and 16mm a day for the past fortnight.

    Cattle feedlots unaffected by heat: Australian Lot Feeders
    Association president Malcolm Foster said he had not heard of any
    problem in cattle feedlots because of the heat.

    The Land, 5/1/2006, p. 8

    Source: Erisk – www.erisk.net

  • Scientist discovers melanin can generate electricity from sunlight

    Cheap, green electrical devices: The ultimate goal of his group,
    the Soft Condensed Matter Physics Group, is to understand more about
    the physics and chemistry of this biological material and build low
    cost, environmentally friendly electrical devices from it. Dr
    Meredith’s group has already built a prototype sensor with melanin that
    measures water content but it is also building an organic chemical
    sensor and transistor.

    The Courier Mail, 21/9/2005, p. 31

    Source: Erisk – www.erisk.net 

  • Insecticides double leukemia risk

    CHILDREN frequently exposed to household
    insecticides used on plants, lawns and in head lice shampoos appear to
    run double the risk of developing childhood leukaemia, research
    suggests.

    A study by French doctors, published today in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine,
    supports concerns raised in recent years about the use of toxic
    insecticides around the home and garden — including plant sprays,
    medication shampoos and mosquito repellents — and a possible
    correlation with increased rates of acute leukaemia in children.

    See The Times Online  

  • US and Australia diverge on solar power

    What a amazing world we live in. I sure hope you can make some sense of
    the above cause I sure can’t. You would think our Australian
    politicians lived on another planet. I’m sure Canberra’s decision had
    nothing to do with the AP6 Climate Conference where Australia opened
    it’s door to selling nuclear fuels to who ever can pay.

    As we
    need another 40 TW or so of generating capacity by the end of this
    century, we only need to build say 40,000 1GW nuclear plants to do the
    job. Lots of Australian mined nuclear fuel to be sure. And it will be
    so secure that no nuclear terrorist will ever get their hands on the
    fuel rods. Well, maybe just one or two missing rods is an acceptable
    loss. Wonder what the
    terrorists will do with them??

    Lets have a vote for your view of the future:

    1) 2 or 3 nuclear reactors in EVERY major city or so. Say every 100 km2 or
    so. Easy to visit cause they are so close to where you live.

    2) Solar on you roof receiving energy from the Sun hanging in the sky.

    Either way, yes it’s nuclear energy. I know which I feel safer about.
    What about your vote?

    All the best,
    Greg Watson
    Green and Gold Energy
    Adelaide, South Australia
    +61 408 843 089
    http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au
    Online SunBall discussion group
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sunball
     

  • California offers solar rebates

    SAN FRANCISCO – Hoping to make California a world leader in solar power,
    state energy regulators Thursday approved some $3 billion in customer
    rebates over the next decade to encourage people to install solar panels on
    their roofs.

    The goal is to get Californians to install equipment capable of producing
    3,000 megawatts of solar electricity on 1 million homes, businesses and
    public buildings over the next 10 years. That is enough energy to power 2.3
    million homes.

    “The California Solar Initiative is the largest solar program in the
    country, and I hope it will be a model for other states,” said Dian
    Grueneich, a member of the state Public Utility Commission. “The program
    will be a major source of dependable and environmentally friendly
    electricity.”

    The PUC voted 3-1 to provide $2.9 billion in rebates for solar panels
    between 2007 and 2016. Last month, the five-member commission approved $300
    million in rebates for 2006.

    Solar advocates said the program will make solar energy more affordable,
    create jobs, reduce air pollution and cut emissions of heat-trapping gases
    blamed for global warming.

    The project incorporates many of the same provisions in a plan advanced by
    Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. That plan had bipartisan support but died in the
    Legislature last year because of disputes over its labor provisions.

    “When I ran for office, I promised the people of California an affordable,
    reliable and more environmentally friendly energy
    supply,” Schwarzenegger said in a statement. “Today is a big step toward
    that goal.”

    Only about 100 megawatts, about 0.3 percent of California’s electricity
    capacity, now comes from rooftop solar panels, installed on about 15,000
    homes and businesses, according to Environment California.

    Thursday’s initiative includes $2.5 billion in rebates for existing homes,
    businesses and public buildings that install solar panels. An additional
    $350 million in rebates will be offered for solar installations on new
    homes.

    The initiative rewards people who act fast. Home or business owners who
    install panels this year will be eligible for a $2.80 rebate for each watt
    of capacity installed; the rebate drops to 25 cents per watt by 2016.

    The rebates will be funded by a surcharge on gas and electricity bills. Most
    residential customers will pay an extra $12 a year.
    Critics questioned whether ratepayers should subsidize the most expensive
    form of renewable energy, and whether the program will drive down the costs
    of solar energy, as backers claim.

    “We need rates to go down, but this goes in the other direction,” said
    Joseph Lyons, a lobbyist for the California Manufacturers and Technology
    Association.

    Solar advocates said they expect the state spending will lead to more solar
    energy ventures.

    “We anticipate that there are going to be a lot of companies getting into
    this space and thriving in this space,” said Matthew Cheney, chief executive
    of San Francisco-based Renewable Ventures, which provides financing for
    renewable energy projects
    ========================================

    I now understand why the AGO will not answer my requests for the SunBall to
    be registered for rebates. The SunBall will put coal, gas and nuclear power
    plants out of business and thus reduce Australian sales of gas, coal and
    uranium. That is something which is clearly not in the “Nuclear is
    Greenhouse Friendly” interest of Australia.

    Ok so there will be no rebates for the SunBall and SunCube. So be it but now
    it is time to turn up the heat a bit and create a new solar PV market
    segment which doesn’t need rebates to survive or governmental interference
    to make sure a growing solar PV industry it doesn’t upset the fossil and
    nuclear fuel supply industry nor the electricity generation, transmission,
    distribution and retail industry.

    SunBall and SunCube (smaller DIY version) prices have now dropped 25% (down
    to wholesale pricing) and will be selling direct over the internet.
    Electrical installation can be quickly done by any qualified electrician.

    I don’t need the AGO’s rebates and through them their ability to control the
    solar PV industry. Its time for the industry to grow up, throw off rebates
    and make our way in the world, free of government strings and industry
    controls geared through the on again off again solar rebates.

    I’m really pissed off if you can’t
    tell………………………………..

    All the best,
    Greg Watson
    Green and Gold Energy
    Adelaide, South Australia
    +61 408 843 089
    http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au
    Online SunBall discussion group
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sunball
     

  • Fed Govt’s renewable energy targets deemed too low by industry

    Government renewable energy incentives insufficient: Brazzale
    said REC prices had to be $35 and above to sustain the industry.
    Industry figures say they can survive thanks to long-term purchasing
    contracts or because prices are still strong enough to remain viable.
    However, others are looking overseas due to insufficient incentives.

    Power stations earn RECs to meet Government’s low targets: Power
    stations classed by the Government as renewable energy sources can earn
    one REC for each megawatt hour of energy produced. They can sell these
    RECs to wholesale energy buyers, who use them to prove they are buying
    more renewable energy – thus helping to meet the Government’s renewable
    energy targets, which the industry says are too low.

    150 megawatts needed to reach low target: Another factor is a
    council study that concluded only 150 megawatts from grid-connected
    projects would be needed for a mandatory 2010 renewable energy target.

    Pacific Hydro postpones wind-power projects due to REC price fall:
    Wind and water-power producer Pacific Hydro is hoping for an emissions
    trading scheme to start by 2010 to boost profits. It said the fall in
    RECs had caused it to postpone some wind-power projects.

    Pacific Hydro looks outside Aust for greater return on $1b investment:
    The company has almost $1 billion to invest over five years but it
    might look at areas ranging from Chile to Fiji and North America for a
    greater return on investment.

    The Advertiser, 11/1/2006, p. 51

    Source: Erisk – www.erisk.net