Author: Neville

  • With Extreme Weather Events Expected to Worsen, NYC Prepares

    With Extreme Weather Events Expected to Worsen, NYC Prepares

    By Kristen Meriwether, | June 11, 2013

    Last Updated: June 11, 2013 7:16 am
    Give feedback
    Print Friendly
    1 of 2
    <
    >

    Large waves generated by Hurricane Sandy crash into Jeanette’s Pier in Nags Head, N.C. on Oct. 27, 2012. (Gerry Broome/AP Photo)

    NEW YORK—Superstorm Sandy, which flooded much of the New York City coastline, causing billions in damage, was a perfect storm: enormous size, a rare westward hook, and hitting at exactly high tide.

    It is impossible to know if the stars will align for New York City to see another perfect storm exactly like the first, but the Bloomberg Administration nonetheless believes a destructive weather pattern will continue due to climate change, and also that things are likely to get worse.

    At City Hall on Monday, June 10, Seth Pinsky, director of the Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Resiliency, described what would have happened if the storm had hit nine hours earlier. The northern part of Queens, especially LaGuardia Airport and Willets Point, as well as Hunts Point in the Bronx, would have taken on six to 12 feet of water.

    Hunts Point houses the largest food distribution center in the world, and La Guardia Airport saw just over 25 million passengers in 2011, the last year data was available.

    “If it had hit nine hours earlier, we would have been dealing with a much more significant disruption to the food supply that serves 60 percent of the restaurants in New York City,” said Deputy Mayor Cas Holloway.

    The storm didn’t hit Hunts Point, and instead the city saw severe flooding in the southern boroughs, but it was a lesson for Holloway and Pinsky. The men are tasked with devising a plan to protect the city from future storms.

    “Our focus should not be on preparing for the next Sandy, preparing for a storm that will do precisely the same thing in precisely the same places, in precisely the same way,” said Holloway. “In fact, there are all kinds of different [variables] that could impact much different areas of the city.”

    Article Continues after the discussion. Vote and comment

    Related discussion:Is global warming natural or man-made? 

    As the world around us changes, the city plans to be more prepared. City data estimates the 100-year floodplain will encompass 801,000 residents by 2050. During Superstorm Sandy, which used FEMA maps from 1983, only 218,000 residents were in the 100-year flood plain—and much of the flooding in Brooklyn far exceeded that mark.

    Heavy Rains

    With little green space to absorb heavy rains, spring downpours already present problems for the city. As effects from climate change take place, the Bloomberg administration said they will have to prepare for more consistent heavy rains.

    Dr. Radley Horton, Climate Scientist at Columbia Earth Institute, said the Northeast has seen a 75 percent increase in heavy rainfall events since 1958.

    “That positive trend is consistent with what we expect as the planet warms,” Dr. Horton said. “A warmer planet can hold more moisture. That moisture tends to fall out in very heavy events.”

    Even if the heavy rain falls out of the city, as it did with hurricanes Irene and Lee, it could present problems for New York City’s drinking water. Heavy rain causes sediment to fall into the reservoirs, an event called turbidity.

    “Once your water is cloudy, you can’t use that part of the supply until the sediment settles and the water is clear,” Holloway said. “We had portions of the water supply that were offline for months [following Irene].”

    Holloway said the more often extreme weather events occur, the more challenging it will be for the city to deal with.

    New York City prides itself on not treating its water, something that may change with the effects of climate change.

    Heat Wave

    Much of the focus in the climate change debate has been on the rising seas, but rising temperatures are expected to present another problem for the city.

    Heatwaves, characterized by three or more days of 90 degree-plus weather, are not uncommon in the city, but the frequency is expected to intensify. City data shows a recent average of 18 days of 90-degree-plus weather, but by 2050, that total is expected to jump to 57, the current level for Birmingham, Alabama.

    Dr. Horton says while the jumps may not look like much, tiny changes add up.

    “A small shift in average conditions, whether it is sea level or temperature, can have profound impact on the frequency of extreme events,” Dr. Horton said. “So a small amount of sea level rise is enough to mean a much greater frequency of coastal flooding events because you are elevating the baseline, even if storms don’t get any stronger.”

    Mayor Bloomberg will present his suggestions for how the city will address climate change issues on Tuesday.

  • Send an email to the Premier to show your support for a Special Commission of Inquiry into coal dust in the Hunter

    Send an email to the Premier to show your support for a Special Commission of Inquiry into coal dust in the Hunter

    Inbox
    x
    Coal Terminal Action Group via email.nationbuilder.com
    11:45 AM (4 hours ago)

    to me

    Dear Nevile,

    You may have heard that, on the 30th May, the Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) released a report concluding that:

    “Loaded coal trains were not associated with a statistically significant difference in PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations when compared with the concentrations recorded when no train was passing the monitoring station.”

    The Hunter Community Environment Centre has received a leaked copy of the report, dated just six days before the version that was released to the public, which reached quite different conclusions. The leaked report states that:

    “Loaded coal trains and unloaded coal trains were associated with a statistically significant elevation in particulate matter concentrations when compared with the concentrations recorded when no train was passing the monitoring station.”

    Many other conclusions have been altered and data apparently reclassified between the two versions of the report. The effect of these alterations is to mislead the Government and the people of NSW into believing that coal trains do not cause coal dust emissions, when the opposite is true.

    In light of this, an independent Special Commission of Inquiry should be established to investigate the issue of coal dust in the Hunter and to get to the bottom of this issue. In addition, the planning process for any infrastructure projects that may contribute to elevated airborne dust levels in the Hunter should be suspended, pending the recommendations of the Special Commission of Inquiry. This includes the proposed fourth coal terminal, which would increase coal train movements by 107 per day, resulting in a significant increase in particle pollution.

    For this issue to be resolved, we urgently need your help.

    Please send an email to the Premier today to show your support for a Special Commission of Inquiry into this issue.

    Thank you very much for your continued involvement and support!

    Best wishes,

    Annika Dean

    President, Hunter Community Environment Centre
    On behalf of the Coal Terminal Action Group

    For more information, including a table comparing the findings of the two reports, please click here.

    -=-=-
    coalterminalactiongroup · Australia
    This email was sent to nevilleg729@gmail.com. To stop receiving emails, click here.
    You can also keep up with Coal Terminal Action Group on Facebook.
    -=-=-

    Created with NationBuilder, the essential toolkit for leaders.

  • Did you know our national parks don’t have adequate national protection? GET_UP

    GetUp!
    9:03 AM (1 hour ago)

    to me
    Our New National Parks

    Dear NEVILLE,

    Did you know our national parks don’t have adequate national protection?

    Recently, State Premiers have moved to allow logging, mining, cattle grazing and amateur shooters in our parks, and things are only getting worse.

    If you saw Four Corners on Monday, you’ll know the Shooters and Fishers Party, who have the balance of power in the NSW Senate, are trying to water down gun laws and expand shooting in national parks.

    Federal Ministers have tried to step in, but often lack the legal authority to do so. That could change, but we have to act quickly. There are eight more sitting days in Parliament before the pre-election break. Realistically, the Government has to act immediately to introduce federal protection for our national parks.

    Sign the petition and we’ll call on Environment Minister Tony Burke to introduce legislation before Parliament breaks.

    http://www.getup.org.au/protect-our-parks

    Smart Federal protections would give our parks an extra line of defence. It would stop irresponsible State Premiers putting short-term profits ahead of the preservation of our parks.

    Without Federal protection, here are some of the dangers our national parks face:

    Recently, in Victoria:

    • the Victorian Government made changes to effectively sell off its national parks; a proposal that will see chunks of national park land offered in 99 year leases. [1]

    In Queensland:

      • Campbell Newman opened 440,000 hectares of parks and reserves for cattle grazing – a practice proven to pollute waterways, trample delicate wetlands, cause soil erosion and spread weeds. [2]
    • Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney called for industry to fight green groups that are lobbying against new coal ports and dredging channels in our Great Barrier Reef. [3]

    In New South Wales:

      • the Upper House parliamentary committee proposed logging be allowed in national parks [4]
    • Barry O’Farrell intends to move forward with his deal with the Shooters and Fishers Party that will allow hunting in NSW parks despite a review saying it will pose a significant risk to human life [5]
    • NSW rolled back protection laws allowing fishing to occur in marine parks. [6]

    In South Australia:

    • Premier Jay Weatherill let shooters loose in national parks, leading to a young man being wounded by stray gunfire. [7]

    All of this shows us that state governments alone cannot be trusted with our world renowned and cherished natural areas.

    Let’s do something meaningful to ensure our parks are still around for our children to enjoy.

    Sign the petition calling for Federal protection of our national parks.

    http://www.getup.org.au/protect-our-parks

    Thanks,
    the GetUp team

    [1] Private leases plan for national parks, The Age, May 30, 2013
    [2] Tony Burke unable to stop cattle in national parks, The Age, May 22, 2013
    [3] Fight against green groups: Seeney, Brisbane Times, May 29, 2013
    [4] Logging looms in national parks, Sydney Morning Herald, May 13, 2013
    [5] Premier O’Farrell to allow hunting in NSW national parks, ABC. net.au, 31 May, 2012
    [6] Recreational fishing allowed in NSW marine parks, ABC. net.au, March 12, 2013
    [7] Shooting accident reignites call for hunting ban, ABC. net.au, May 19, 2013


    GetUp is an independent, not-for-profit community campaigning group. We use new technology to empower Australians to have their say on important national issues. We receive no political party or government funding, and every campaign we run is entirely supported by voluntary donations. If you’d like to contribute to help fund GetUp’s work, please donate now! If you have trouble with any links in this email, please go directly to www.getup.org.au. To unsubscribe from GetUp, please click here. Authorised by Sam Mclean, Level 2, 104 Commonwealth Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010.

    Reply
    Forward
  • OPINION: Need to plan for sea-level rise

    OPINION: Need to plan for sea-level rise

    By Tom FitzGerald

    June 10, 2013, 10:32 p.m.

    • CREEK CREW: Kayakers on Throsby Creek paddle into the sunset after the rain.   Picture: Max Mason-HubersCREEK CREW: Kayakers on Throsby Creek paddle into the sunset after the rain. Picture: Max Mason-Hubers

    AUSTRALIANS have an enduring love affair with beaches and coastal lakes.

    They are the stuff of idyllic childhood holidays, teenage dreams, family escapes and retirement peace.  Fresh salty air, sparkling water, accessible shorelines, boats to muck around in, the sound of the waves on the shore. These are  personal and national values that we all want to protect.

    They are threatened by severe weather events that temporarily raise water levels and damage shorelines (which could happen at any time) and by longer-term changes to climate and sea level which can make matters worse.

    Lake Macquarie is no different.  One of Australia’s largest estuarine waterways, the lake has historically been a haven for mining families seeking a seaside break and an escape from the pollution of old Newcastle and Sydney.

    Lake Macquarie now features extensive permanent residential development and infrastructure close to its shoreline. Its popular foreshore reserves contain picnic, walking and boating infrastructure.

    The city was ranked as one of the most vulnerable to coastal flooding in the 2009 Australian government review of climate change hazards.

    These risks are related to the value of private development and community infrastructure on low-lying parts of the foreshore like Marks Point and Pelican, which are occasionally flooded now and are likely to be flooded more frequently as sea level rises.

    As highlighted by Bob Carter in his opinion piece (Herald May 23), the records from the best long-term tide gauge in eastern Australia, at Fort Denison in Sydney Harbour, are showing that the sea level is rising.

    It has been rising, at variable rates, for most of the last century.  Based on these historical trends and the best available science, it is reasonable to assume that the sea level will continue to rise over the coming decades.  The historical average rate of rise from Fort Denison provides a starting point for considering the potential impacts of higher sea levels on communities in the future.   We can be certain that changes to sea level will continue.

    What is uncertain is the likely rate of these future rises and the time frames over which impacts will be experienced.  Consequently, continuing to monitor, analyse and report future changes to sea level is good practice.

    It is also reasonable for a local council managing vulnerable and high value community assets to be thinking about other, higher and faster sea level rise scenarios than those we have experienced so far.

    Our national scientific advisers at CSIRO expect that the rate of sea level rise will increase in coming decades as thresholds are passed and  changes to icecap melting, oceanic circulation and other factors occur.

    There is strong agreement that coastal areas will experience increased flooding as the sea level rises, posing an increasing hazard to those living and working around estuary shorelines like Lake Macquarie.  This scenario would bring difficult choices for vulnerable low-lying communities in the years ahead, but the exact timing and cost of these choices is not yet clear.

    It is appropriate for a council as a prudent managing authority to plan for these impacts and to continue to monitor and reassess the rate at which changes are occurring into the future.

    So Lake Macquarie City Council must engage in conversations with residents of the most vulnerable, low-lying areas, like Swansea, Pelican and Marks Point, to talk through potential sea level rise scenarios, and the options that are available to manage impacts on assets, access, safety and lifestyles into the future.

    These are important issues for any community. Out of those community conversations can come shared understanding of the science of estuary processes; agreement about how best to monitor and report actual changes in sea level and storms; agreement on the degree of community or individual risk that might be “tolerable”; awareness of the implications for emergency management; and an understanding of what action to take and when to take it.

    These actions might include planning controls, changes to building design, protection works like levees, or any other innovation that provides the community a path to better adapt to a changing climate.

    An appropriate response now will not necessarily be an effective response in another decade or two.  Good councils work closely with local communities to make decisions together and to monitor progress.

    As with all hazard management, the rule of thumb is to prepare for the worst and hope for the best.

    At present the rate of sea level increase is low and some adaptation options to reduce risks affecting individual residents and the broader community that enjoys the lake shoreline may not be immediately justifiable.

    What is immediate is the need to plan for various future scenarios and then to monitor and review future impacts regularly.

    Tom FitzGerald is the branch convener of the Australian Coastal Society NSW

  • Political fundraiser with PM Julia Gillard and author Ben Elton in limbo as school pulls out as host

    Political fundraiser with PM Julia Gillard and author Ben Elton in limbo as school pulls out as host

    ABCUpdated June 11, 2013, 8:16 pm

    A political fundraiser with Prime Minister Julia Gillard and author and entertainer Ben Elton in Perth is in limbo after an independent public school refused to host the event.

    The event is being advertised as a question-and-answer session between Ms Gillard and Elton, with tickets costing up to $250.

    A total of 200 tickets have been sold with proceeds going towards Fremantle MP Melissa Parke’s federal election campaign.

    The state’s Education Minister Peter Collier says the John Curtin School of the Arts in Fremantle pulled out of hosting the event today when it realised it was a political fundraiser.

    He says he fully supports the school’s decision.

    “I think it is just inappropriate to have a political fundraiser in a public school,” he said.

    Ms Parke says the State Government is playing dirty tricks and there was no attempt to disguise it was a political event.

    “We’ve been absolutely upfront, it’s been in our advertising, it’s been on our website,” she said.

    “We’ve got a written statement from the Minister of Education’s office that they had no problems with the event.”

    Ms Parke says it is an extraordinary political intervention.

    “The Barnett government may think it runs a police state here in WA but we’re not going to let them suppress a perfectly legitimate Fremantle political event,” she said.

    “This is an extraordinary political intervention that displays a pettiness at the heart of the Barnett government.”

    Organisers are exploring other venue options and maintain the event will go ahead.

  • Deadly floods threaten northern Germany

    Deadly floods threaten northern Germany

    • AAP
    • June 11, 2013 7:25PM
    German Chancellor Angela Merkel visits Wittenberge, Germany

    German Chancellor Angela Merkel has praised rescue efforts on her third trip to flooded regions.

    Newsletter-article-promo

    DEADLY floods forging a path of devastation through central Europe for more than a week are bearing down on northern Germany as troops race to bolster sodden dykes.

    Swollen rivers in the German states of Saxony-Anhalt and Schleswig-Holstein pose the biggest threat after flood waters caused billions of euros in damage and left at least 19 people dead across Europe.

    Two burst dykes on Monday alleviated some of the pressure on other fortifications up the Elbe River, but around 9000 soldiers were deployed in Saxony-Anhalt in the centre of the country to ensure they held.

    And in Schleswig-Holstein in the north, fears focused on the town of Lauenburg, 40 kilometres southeast of Hamburg, where the Elbe is expected to peak on Thursday.

    There the river has already reached a level of 9.56 metres, more than double the normal.

    Power was cut to the old quarter of the town and some 400 people had to be evacuated.

    Downriver the Elbe stabilised as towns and cities remained in a state of alert, particularly in Magdeburg, the capital of Saxony-Anhalt, where more than 20,000 have had to seek emergency shelter.

    Meanwhile, Hungarians breathed a sigh of relief as the level of the Danube continued to fall on Tuesday.

    Travel restrictions in Budapest were expected to remain in place for another week but a key bridge linking Hungary to Slovakia reopened to traffic.

    Chancellor Angela Merkel made her third trip to the German disaster region on Monday and praised the “impressive” work of volunteers to keep the muddy waters at bay.

    Merkel, who is just over three months away from a general election, is to meet Germany’s 16 state leaders Thursday to discuss recovery efforts.