Author: Neville

  • ABC to have full coverage of Federal Election Results on 14 September

    June 08, 2013

    ABC to have full coverage of Federal Election Results on 14 September

    For most people, the above headline may sound like an assertion of the obvious.

    However, in the discussion over recent weeks as to whether television networks will host their election coverages from the National Tally Room, some people have become confused and thought that if the ABC does not attend the National Tally Room, then the ABC will not be doing a coverage of the results.

    This is not correct. The ABC will have its usual full coverage of the results from 6pm on 14 September, including me, Kerry O’Brien and other ABC hosts, as well as a panel of party politicians. There will be electorate results, graphics, calls of the board and live crosses including the victory and concession speeches.

    In short, everything you would expect from an election coverage.

    The National Tally Room is arranged and run by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC). Already the commercial television networks have announced they will not be attending the tally room. At this stage the ABC is close to announcing officially whether it will host from the National Tally Room or not, with the likelihood it will host from elsewhere.

    What the AEC chooses to do with the National Tally Room if the television networks including the ABC do not attend is a matter entirely for the AEC. The AEC proposed to get rid of the National Tally Room after the 2004 election, but withdrew the proposal when both the commercial networks and federal politicians requested it be continued.

    Whatever happens, the ABC will be providing a full coverage of the 14 September election results, whether there is a tally room or not.

    You can read an article I wroteb three years vago on the future of the National Tally Room via this link.

    Posted by on June 08, 2013 at 01:26 PM in Federal Politics and Governments | Permalink

  • Bangladesh – Climate Displacement

    Bangladesh – Climate Displacement

    Few countries are under as much threat from climate change as Bangladesh. DS is working with our partners in Bangladesh Young Power in Social Action to find viable housing, land and property solutions to those displaced by climate change.

    Activities of the Initiative

    Publications

    DS report on Climate Displacement in Bangladesh: The Need for Urgent Housing, Land and Property Rights Solutions, May 2012

    Displacement Solutions has recently published a ground-breaking new report on climate displacement in Bangladesh.

    This 36-page report comprehensively examines the scope and causes of climate displacement across Bangladesh. Drawing on extensive fieldwork, the report highlights that climate displacement is not just a phenomenon to be addressed at some point in the future, it is a crisis that is unfolding across Bangladesh now. Sea-level rise and tropical cyclones in coastal areas, as well as flooding and riverbank erosion in mainland areas, are already resulting in the loss of homes, land and property and leading to mass displacement. Further, all of the natural hazards that are causing displacement are expected to increase in both frequency and intensity as a result of climate change – almost inevitably leading to the displacement of many millions more across Bangladesh.

    This report comprehensively examines current and future causes of climate displacement in Bangladesh. The report also examines existing and proposed Government and civil society policies and programmes intended to provide solutions to climate displacement. The report highlights a number of protection gaps in the response of both the Government of Bangladesh and the international community to the plight of climate displaced persons. The report emphasises that rights-based solutions, in particular, housing, land and property rights solutions must be utilised as the basis for solving this crisis.

    The report concludes by proposing a number of concrete recommendations that could be utilized to provide solutions to climate displacement.

    The report can be downloaded here.


    New article on “The Management of Climate Displacement”, written by Scott Leckie, the Director of Displacement Solutions, in the December 2012 issue of Forced Migration Review.

    In his article, Scott Leckie concludes that “climate change has forced those who care about displacement into the unfamiliar position of seeking solutions before displacement occurs: in effect, becoming land seekers for future displaced communities and active advocates for resettlement when remaining in place fails to be a viable option“. 

    The article is available here.


    Article on “Domestic Land Solutions for Bangladesh” published in May 2012 on the New Internationalist Blog.

    Read Scott Leckie and Ezekiel Simperingham’s recent observational piece on the climate displacement situation in Bangladesh, published by a highly acclaimed independent monthly not-for-profit magazine/blog that reports on actions in support of global justice. The New Internationalist believes in putting people before profit, in climate justice, tax justice, equality, social responsibility and human rights for all, views shared by Displacement Solutions. To access it, click here.


    DS Photo Booklet on Climate Displacement in Bangladesh, Kadir van Lohuizen Photography, April 2011


    In January 2011, a team from Displacement Solutions visited Khulna District in Bangladesh – the ground zero of climate change. DS and its partners the Association for Climate Refugees visited some of the world’s most destitute locations affected by large-scale climate-induced displacement in the world today. Climate Displacement in Bangladesh, catalogues images captured by world renowned photo journalist Kadir Van Lohuizen during the DS mission to the southwestern delta region of Bangladesh.

    This publication is available to download here.

    The people pictured in the booklet are just some of the 6.5 million who have already been displaced by climate change in Bangladesh – people who desperately need their housing, land and property rights met, not some time in the future, but today. Their faces and circumstances of life tell a tale of both hope and despair.


    DS Article – Bangladesh’s Climate Displacement Nightmare, April 2011

    This article, published by the Ecologist and written by Scott Leckie, Ezekiel Simperingham and Jordan Bakker after their DS field trip to Bangladesh in January 2011, discusses the crisis that climate change poses for Bangladesh and stresses the need for action to be taken now to protect the human rights of all current displaced persons in Bangladesh, and to prevent mass human rights violations in the future. To read this article, click here.


    DS Missions to Bangladesh

    In January, October and November 2011 and April 2012, DS visited areas affected by climate displacement across Bangladesh.

    Working closely with the Association for Climate Refugees (ACR) and Young Power in Social Action (YPSA), DS has visited climate displacement and relocation sites throughout Bangladesh, conducted trainings on the human rights dimensions of climate displacement with civil society representatives and community leaders, met with government officials and representatives, from the local Union to the national Ministerial level and has held numerous meetings with climate affected individuals and communities to better understand the situation and scope of the climate displacement crisis in Bangladesh.

    DS remains committed to working with our partners and the Government of Bangladesh to find urgent housing, land and property rights solutions for the current and future millions of climate displaced people across Bangladesh.

    In January 2011, DS sent a five-person team to visit climate-affected areas in Bangladesh – read about it here and see the mission report.

    In October and November 2011, DS visited Bangladesh focusing on the scope and causes of river erosion across the country.

    In April 2012, DS again visited Bangladesh, focusing on the causes and scope of climate displacement across Chittagong Division. A report on this visit prepared by Young Power in Social Action can be read here.


    Further Resources

    In this part of the website you will find links to articles, reports and films about how climate change is causing displacement in Bangladesh:

    The Dhaka Declaration of the Climate Vulnerable Forum

    Bangladesh is the current chair of the Climate Vulnerable Forum, a partnership of countries most affected by global warming.

    The Government of Bangladesh hosted a ministerial meeting of the Climate Vulnerable Forum on November 13-14, 2011 in Dhaka, Bangladesh.

    The outcome of the meeting was the Dhaka Ministerial Declaration of the Climate Vulnerable Forum (the full text of the Declaration is available here).

    The declaration expressly recognises the challenge of climate displacement and states:

    Aware that climate change induced displacement of people is a major concern and their relocation puts enormous pressure on infrastructures and service facilities; and furthermore, large-scale displacement has the potential to transform into security concerns;

    Recognising that migration is a viable adaptation strategy to ensure that populations are not compelled to reside in high risk and affected areas, and to manage risks during displacement; and furthermore a planned strategy in the long-term to offer displaced populations with enhanced options for dignified and diversified livelihood.


    Association for Climate Refugees (ACR) Progress Report

    This report was released by ACR in January 2011. It outlines ACR’s work in relation to the recent DS mission to Bangladesh. To access, click here.


    Films from the Guardian

    Here are links to three extraordinary films from the Guardian on climate displacement in Bangladesh; displacement that is happening not 30 years in the future, but today. All of these are highly recommended viewing to better understand the scale and tragedy of climate displacement, as well as in developing solutions to this immense challenge.

    For the film about Bangladesh climate migration, click here here.

    For the film about Bangladesh climate migrants in Dhaka, click here.

    For the film about Bangladesh climate aid, click here.


    Bangladesh NAPA

    The Government of Bangladesh’s National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) from 2005 is available here.


    Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan (BCCSAP)

    In 2008, to carry forward the work of the NAPA, the BCCSAP was designed. Click here to access it.


    The Dhaka Solution

    The article “The Dhaka Solution” by Sebastian Strangio provides a brief overview of the challenges facing Bangladesh caused by climate change. It can be accessed
    here.


    EACH-FOR Bangladesh

    The EACH-FOR project, funded by the EU, investigated a number of environmental change and forced migration scenarios, including a case study in Bangladesh. To access, click here.


    The Constitution of Bangladesh

    To access the Bangladesh Constitution and view the relevant HLP provisions, click here.


    Bangladesh risks becoming failed state, retired general says

    The text of this article by Laurie Goering, published on 3 February, 2010, is available here.


    Climate Refugees in Bangladesh – Answering the Basics: The Where, How, Who and How Many (as at May 2010)

    Extreme climate events – be it the result of environmental destruction by people, or naturally occurring changes in climate – are forcing people to flee their traditional place of residence with enormous sufferings in points of transit and the points of destination without any support from aid agencies or Government authorities. ACR (Association for Climate Refugees), a network of NGOs have been making some efforts in seeking answers to basic questions, like how and where the people have been made refugees, who the refugees are, and how many they are.

    Where and how: Mass scale forced displacement has been caused by tidal floods in the exposed coastal area and loss of land due to erosion in the main land river basins

    The population in the South and South-East Asia coastline extending from the east coast of India to the coast of Myanmar have been tasting the salt taste of annual cyclones from the Bay of Bengal with ever increasing tidal floods. Due to its existence in the middle of the coastline, Bangladesh is either the worst or the common victim irrespective of the locations where the cyclones make the landfall. Cyclones are not only resulting in human casualties and destruction of properties but also leaving behind perpetual tidal floods. The cyclone Sidr of 2007, Nargis of 2008, Aila of 2009 and Laila of 2010 are the annual extreme events among a number of other hazards. Bangladesh had to endure the entire attack of Sidr while sharing that of Nargis with Myanmar and Aila plus Laila with India. An indigenous research in Dakshin Bedkashi (Koyra Upazila) reveals that tidal flood water level had risen by 1 meter during 5 years (2004 to 2008) but it rose by an additional 1 meter in 2009 alone and in 2010 it continues to rise further. The prevailing hazards and the vulnerability alarm a grave risk to the coast dwellers, with particular emphasis on those in the exposed areas in 12 districts at the south of Bangladesh namely Satkhira, Khulna, Bagerhat, Pirojpur, Barguna, Patuakhali, Bhola, Laxmipur, Feni, Noakhali, Chittagong and Cox’s Bazar.

    Around one million people have been rendered homeless due to river erosion in the mainland river basins over the last three decades as the mighty Brahmaputra-Jamuna continues to widen due to decrease in its depth for heavy rush of sediments from the upstream and poor erosion management in the downstream. Official statistics show that the Brahmaputra-Jamuna, a major river system in Bangladesh, has widened to 11.8 km now from 8.3 km in the early ’70s, eroding about 87,790 hectares of land. (CEGIS, 2006). NGOs affiliated with ACR working in the mainland river basin report observing people forced to flee their traditional place of residence due to river erosion at a greater pace. Hotspots of such incidence encompass 10 districts namely Kurigram, Gaibandha, Jamalpur, Bogra, Sirajganj, Rangpur, Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari, Mymensingh and Netrakona.

    Bangladesh comprises of 64 districts out of which 22 are major climate refugee generating districts.

    Who and how many: The poorer people who used to live in exposed locations are the climate refugees and they are 6 million in number

    The poorer people who used to live in the extremely exposed locations in the coastal belt and the main land river basins of Bangladesh are the first to become climate refugees in recent years.

    Tidal floods have already badly affected 56% of the 422 unions (lowest unit in the local government) of the 48 upazilas (sub-districts) in the exposed coastal zone of Bangladesh. Most of the villages in the badly affected 236 unions are being flooded by tidal saline water twice a day for the last 3 years. Houses, Land and Properties (HLP) of 2,462,789 people (32%) of the 7,693,331 inhabitants (in the affected unions alone) have been destroyed by repeated cyclones and king tides. Of them, 1,568,980 (64%) are languishing as Local Climate Refugees (LCR) on remainings of embankments or higher grounds in the exposed zone, 675,113 (27%) squatter as Internal Climate Refugees (ICR) in cities including Dhaka and 218,656 (9%) are earning wages by modern slavery as Global Climate Refugees (GCR) across the country borders. Situation in the exposed coast is worsening and it is predicted that the number of climate refugees from the coast will be raised to 3 million by the end of 2010.

    River bank erosions have already badly affected 44% of the 407 unions (lowest unit in the local government) of the 36 upazilas (sub-districts) in the exposed main land river basins of Bangladesh. Most of the villages in the badly affected 179 unions are being eroded by onrush of flash flood waters every year during the last 3 decades. Houses, Land and Properties (HLP) of 1,452,588 people (42%) of the 3,490,500 inhabitants (in the affected unions alone) have been destroyed by annual river erosion often coupled with devastating floods. Of them, 951,531 (66%) are languishing as Local Climate Refugees (LCR) on neighboring embankments or higher grounds in the exposed zone, 375,793 (26%) squatter as Internal Climate Refugees (ICR) in cities including Dhaka and 125,264 (8%) are earning wages by modern slavery as Global Climate Refugees (GCR) across the country borders. Situation in the exposed river basin is worsening and it is predicted that the number of climate refugees from the river basin will be raised to 2 million by the end of 2010.

    The remaining non-exposed 397 upazilas have sporadically generated another 2.1 million climate refugees. Thus altogether the total number of climate refugees in Bangladesh as of May 2010 stands at 6 million out of which at least 1 million are living in Dhaka Mega City. The total number of climate refugees in Bangladesh is expected to be raised to 7.5 million by the end of 2010.

    Hotspots of climate refugees at the point of origin: Island upazilas of Koyra, Shyamnagar and Dacope in the west, and Kutubdia, Hatiya and Swandip in the east of the coastal belt of Bangladesh

    In one way or another, all exposed upazilas are generating climate refugees, but some are more immediately and particularly exposed. The middle coast (Barisal Division) enjoys the comparative advantage of being an active delta with land formation in progress as well as a sweet water ecosystem but the west (Khulna Division) and east (Chittagong Division) coast have been unlawfully deprived of that active delta privilege by India’s unilateral interception in international river course originating from the Himalayas. Hence the west coast has 3 hotspots i.e. Koyra and Dacope in Khulna district, and Shyamnagar in Satkhira district. The east coast also has 3 hotspots i.e. Kutubdia in Cox’s Bazar district, Swandip in Chittagong district and Hatiya in Noakhali district.

    Response to the plight of the Climate Refugees

    The Finance Minister of Bangladesh Government has a clear response by saying “We are asking all our development partners to honour the natural right of persons to migrate. We can’t accommodate all these people – this is already the densest [populated] country in the world.” in a video interview with the Guardian. Repeated cyclones and tidal floods have substantially destroyed the life line of the coast dwellers – the embankments – which is eating up huge resources but yielding no signs of revival.

    More than 200 NGOs in Bangladesh are working for resettlement of the climate refugees. They had participated, as a finalist, in the World Bank’s Global Competition on Climate Adaptation held on 10-13 November 2009 in Washington, D.C. but could not win a grant except the World Bank Institute’s Innovation Practice Manager writing “We are indeed working on a range of ideas in which we can communicate with your host governments, other funders in the space, and like-minded partners who can support your projects and perhaps find ways to work with you.”  while responding to a post of the NGOs’ Team Leader in World Bank’s DM Blog. NGOs are negotiating projects with potential donors on climate refugee issues.

    Conclusion

    Climate change is likely to lead to increasing rates of generation of climate refugees, and it is vital that evolving frameworks for climate change adaptation address issues for compliance by national and international communities to peacefully resettle those climate refugees. Climate change is ignoring country borders making it a global problem; we may not ignore country borders now but can surely begin to work regionally and globally for mutual benefits and interests. We welcome suggestions and assistance for effective and efficient resettlement of climate refugees.

    Md. Arifur Rahman Muhammad Abu Musa

    Chairperson, ACR and Founder & Chief Executive, ACR and

    Chief Executive, YPSA President, CRC (Coastal Resource Center)

  • Q+A: Bill McKibben crunches Australia’s climate numbers

    5 June 2013, 3.42pm EST

    Q+A: Bill McKibben crunches Australia’s climate numbers

    US environmentalist and scholar, Bill McKibben, has crunched the numbers: we can emit 565 more gigatons of carbon dioxide worldwide if we want to stay below 2°C of warming, he says. However, the world is on track to burn enough fossil fuels to emit 2,795 gigatons of carbon dioxide. McKibben, who founded…

    3rt67nx9-1370402957
    McKibben has calculated that the world can emit 565 more gigatons of carbon dioxide and stay below 2°C of warming — anything more than that risks catastrophe for life on earth, he says. http://maths.350.org/
    T34fjv3g-1370403178
    McKibben founded the 350.org environmental movement. http://www.flickr.com/photos/350org/

    US environmentalist and scholar, Bill McKibben, has crunched the numbers: we can emit 565 more gigatons of carbon dioxide worldwide if we want to stay below 2°C of warming, he says.

    However, the world is on track to burn enough fossil fuels to emit 2,795 gigatons of carbon dioxide.

    McKibben, who founded the environmental movement 350.org and is pushing companies to get rid of investments in fossil fuels, is currently touring Australia.

    He spoke to The Conversation about what the numbers tell us about climate change and Australia.

    You say the world can emit only 565 gigatons worldwide if we want to stay below 2 degrees C. Have you done the calculations for how much Australia can afford to contribute to that 565 gigatons?

    Here’s one way to do the numbers. If Australia builds out the coal mines it’s currently talking about, then it will release about a third altogether of that 565 gigatons. So that gives you some sense of the scale. Australia constitutes much less than a third of the world population. You begin to sense the problem we are running into.

    Truthfully, if you wanted to figure out some sense of what Australia’s allowance of that 565 gigatons should be, you would figure out what percentage of world population is Australian, which has got to be less than 1% of the world population, and that would be your share. You’d also have to back calculate if it’s fair for Australia to use even that, given it’s probably already used more than its fair share, just like the United States, Canada and other countries.

    If we were allotting space in the atmosphere based on fairness, we would be letting Indians and Africans use most of it from here on in.

    In realistic terms, what we have to do is take these large carbon deposits in Australia, Canada, Venezuela, the Powder River Basin in the US, these seven or eight huge deposits of carbon around the world, and keep them under ground.

    If they ever get out and get burnt, then you can’t make the maths work at all.

    Investment in fossil fuel still gets a pretty good return in Australia. Are you having any luck convincing Australian investors to divest?

    It looks like most of the big miners are starting to head for the exits. BHP is trying to sell much of its coal.

    There are Australians who are beginning to take up these questions. The Uniting Church has divested its shares. We are on our way to the Australian National University today where the students have a powerful divestment movement underway. It’s early days but if I were a coal mining baron in this country, I would be a little bit worried about the upsurge of awareness of what their plans for the planet really are.

    Is your argument that investment in fossil fuels is wrong because it may destroy the world or wrong because one day those investments may be worthless because the world will have moved on from fossil fuels?

    I have to say I worry about the first of those things more than the other. But I do think it’s clear that if you invest in these stocks, you are making a bet that we will never take climate change seriously.

    HSBC ran the numbers a couple of months ago and said that if the world did anything to try to meet its 2 degree Celsius target that everybody, including Australia, has solemnly agreed to then you would have to cut the valuation of all these shares in half.

    So if we ever took climate change seriously, everybody is sitting on a big bubble.

    Who are the biggest investors in Australia in fossil fuels?

    As I understand it, the biggest pools of money are in pension and superannuation funds. We were meeting in Sydney yesterday with people who control some of the big funds in Australia and they are paying more attention for practical reasons and because they understand the science.

    As one of these leading fund guys said yesterday, “Who are we to doubt the science? All of our other investments are based on science and technology, we understand what is going on.”

    The meeting was at the Goldman Sachs office yesterday with a bunch of people running various super funds from around the country, there were about 150 people there with a link up to the Goldman Sachs office in Melbourne.

    Most of our fossil fuels are exported and some argue argue that if we don’t sell fossil fuels to India and China, they’ll either get them elsewhere or their development will slow down. What’s your response to that?

    It is true that, at this point, cheap fossil fuel can be a useful thing but at a certain point you can move from good to bad. It’s like drinking beer all night. There is a point at which it’s not fun any more.

    To judge from the health statistics coming out of China, we are reaching that point. In fact, the Chinese are trying hard to figure out how the hell to get off coal and they are moving aggressively toward renewable energy.

    All these countries have entrenched fossil fuel interests just like Australia does.

    A big study came out last September funded by 20 of the poorest countries on Earth. It showed that by 2030, fossil fuels, between climate change and straight air pollution, would claim about 100 million lives.

    So I think, at this point, the idea that the Australia mining barons are engaged in their work for humanitarian reasons is somewhat suspect.

    Are offset schemes and emission trading schemes a serious way to mitigate against climate change?

    There’s no way to offset the huge volumes of carbon that would come out of these Australian coal mines.

    If everyone in Australia set to work doing nothing but planting trees between now and the end of the century, I don’t think you would have enough trees to soak up the carbon that comes out of these new coal mines.

    One valley, the proposed coal mine for the Galilee Basin, is enough to fill up about 6% of the atmospheric space that we have got.

    In the end, it’s a math problem and the math is pretty daunting.

    It’s not that we should not be planting trees. It’s that we already have too much carbon in the atmosphere. We have already raised the temperature a degree. We have already melted the Arctic. So we should be in an emergency effort right now to deal with that, not adding to the problem.

    Are you seeing much movement to wind back fossil fuel subsidies?

    There’s more attention to and it is more visible and it’s becoming more of an issue all the time. In the United States, it is one of the things Obama is trying to do, to cut those subsidies but they are jealously guarded. In our political system, that financial power translates too easily into political power.

    But that is one of the reasons we build movements, to try and equal the power of the fossil fuel industry with people power.

    Do you think your argument stands a chance against the entrenched place coal has in the Australian economy?

    My sense is that Australians overestimate the amount of their economy based on coal.

    Because it generates outsize returns for a few people, they are able to use it to their political ends.

    But I am pretty sure that a country as blessed with the resources of sun and wind and 21st century fuels doesn’t need to stay completely wedded to 18th century technology. A country as affluent and educated as Australia could figure out something else to do with its people rather than just keep digging up black rocks and burning them.

  • World Oceans Day which is TODAY,


    Dear Inga

    Oceans. They cover 70% of the Earth’s surface and without healthy oceans life on earth can not exist. Yet our oceans are under increasing threat from overfishing, mining and climate change and with less than 2% covered by marine protected areas the time to defend our oceans is now!

    That’s why this World Oceans Day which is TODAY, we are asking you to call on our leaders to create the world’s largest marine sanctuary in Antarctica’s Southern Ocean. This year’s celebration of World Oceans Day is timely. Next month leaders from 25 countries, including the EU, will come together to decide the fate of the last pristine ocean wilderness on Earth, Antarctica’s Southern Ocean.

    In 2008 CCAMLR (the body who manages these waters) agreed to establish a system of marine protected areas in the Southern Ocean. Fast forward five years, there are now solid proposals on the table, all our leaders need to do is stick to their word and say yes.

    Sadly without international leadership and cooperation these proposals will not succeed. How can you help? Well, there are three really easy and fast actions you can take right now:

    1. Click on this Facebook link to share the above picture and add the following message:

    “This World Oceans Day I’m calling on our leaders to protect the last pristine ocean wilderness on Earth, Antarctica’s Southern Ocean.You should too! SIGN the petition here: www.antarcticocean.org and SHARE and LIKE this image with your friends.”

    2. Share this email with five friends and ask them to do the same.

    3. If you haven’t signed the petition yet, do it right now! Go to www.antarcticocean.org.

    While Antarctica’s Southern Ocean seems far away for some of us, the reality is these waters need an entire international community involved in their protection for now and in the future.

    You’ll be hearing from us again soon as we get closer to next month’s meeting in Germany.

    Thank you!

    The AOA Team

    © Antarctic Ocean Alliance 2011
    info@antarcticocean.org | www.antarcticocean.org
  • This is what an ice-free Antarctica looks like

    This is what an ice-free Antarctica looks like

    By Adam Mann

    Check out the most detailed map of a continent never truly seen by human eyes: the de-iced surface of Antarctica. By virtually peeling back the frozen ice sheet and studying the land beneath, researchers can get a better sense of how the southern pole of our planet could react to climate change.

    Bedmap2 was created by the British Antarctic Survey, and used decades of data to produce this detailed view of the frozen continent. NASA’s contribution to the dataset includes surface measurements from its now-retired orbiting Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite, and results from several years of flyovers by specialized aircraft that collected radar and other data measuring changes in the thickness of sea ice, glaciers, and ice sheets as part of Operation IceBridge.

    The work improves on the decade-old Bedmap project, which virtually thawed the continent, but at lower resolution. Both maps combine information on ice thickness, bedrock topography, and surface elevation. Bedmap2 added millions of extra data points and also covers a wider swath of land than its predecessor. Over on NASA’s site, you can compare the two datasets by sliding between them.

    Researchers need good information about the under-ice ground of Antarctica to better simulate its response to changing environmental conditions. Antarctica’s ice is not static but constantly flows to the sea. Knowing the shape of the bedrock and the thickness of the ice allows scientists to model these movements and predict how they could change in the future.

    unfrozencontinent
    NASAexplorer

    This story was produced by Wired as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

    Adam Mann is a Wired Science staff writer.

  • Right now, while you’re reading this email on your phone or computer, you may have a product of slavery in your hand.

    hsi-email-logo-2013.jpg

    Dear NEVILLE,

    Right now, while you’re reading this email on your phone or computer, you may have a product of slavery in your hand.

    The reality is that almost every electronic device we use in our everyday lives could include conflict minerals mined by slaves in the Congo.

    This week, we brought together some of the world’s leading experts to discuss slavery in electronics – and right now, you can download the free podcast of that discussion to learn a few simple steps you can take to prevent slavery from entering your pocket.

    Download the podcast for FREE right now to stop supporting slavery

    You already know that many of the world’s major electronics companies fuel the demand for conflict minerals. As Sasha Lezhnev of the Enough Project explains in the podcast, ‘There are many things that consumers can do to influence these companies, and whether these companies move the needle on this issue is really up to us.’

    The greater the pressure from consumers, the more likely we are to make a real difference. By sharing this podcast on Facebook, Twitter and email, you will help educate consumers and inspire them to join you in taking action.

    Yours in solidarity,
    Amy, Kate, Debra, Mich, Jess, Nick and the Walk Free team


    Walk Free is a movement of people everywhere, fighting to end one of the world’s greatest evils: Modern slavery. 

    Follow on Twitter | Friend on Facebook | Subscribe on Youtube | View this email in your browser

    This email was sent to . You can unsubscribe from WalkFree.org at any time.

    © 2013 WalkFree.org | All rights reserved | www.walkfree.org